From MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us  Tue Jun  2 22:18:18 2009
From: MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us (Michael Glenn)
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:18:18 -0400
Subject: DST vs GroupWise
Message-ID: <4A255EDB.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>

** High Priority **

Folks, I may have myself a bit of a situation here.

Today, I heard in passing that there may be a problem with GroupWise archiving on DST-enabled volumes. As I am partway through a migration over to DST of user spaces that are lousy with GW archives, this was not a piece of news that made me smile. 

Has anyone come across this? Confirm or deny? Work-arounds? Anything? I'm looking at a sleepless night here....

:'(

Thanks.



From tim at nds8.co.uk  Tue Jun  2 22:39:38 2009
From: tim at nds8.co.uk (Tim Heywood)
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:39:38 +0100
Subject: DST vs GroupWise
In-Reply-To: <4A255EDB.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
References: <4A255EDB.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
Message-ID: <4A25AA2A020000BB0005F39B@mail2.nds8.com>

In principle there is no reason why a GW archive cannot be on a DST -
however practically it might well cause you loads of issues.  A GW
Archive is accessed by the GW client over NCP and therefore will only
see the whole (spliced) file system, but the response times might well
make life a little exciting

I would recommend avoiding DST for GroupWise archives if you can...

T


-- 
 
Tim Heywood
NDS8
Novell Platinum Solution Provider
 
Office:  +44 (0) 131 538 8202
Mobile:  +44 (0) 7974 134264








>>> On 02 June, 2009 at 22:18, "Michael Glenn" <MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us>
wrote: 
> ** High Priority **
> 
> Folks, I may have myself a bit of a situation here.
> 
> Today, I heard in passing that there may be a problem with GroupWise

> archiving on DST-enabled volumes. As I am partway through a migration
over to 
> DST of user spaces that are lousy with GW archives, this was not a
piece of 
> news that made me smile. 
> 
> Has anyone come across this? Confirm or deny? Work-arounds? Anything?
I'm 
> looking at a sleepless night here....
> 
> :'(
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Novell mailing list
> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell
> 
> ***Scanned by M+ Guardian***


The information contained in this email is intended for the person to 
whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. You should not copy, retain, forward or disclose its 
contents to anyone else, or take any action based upon it, if it is 
not addressed to you personally. If the message is received by anyone
other 
than the addressee, please notify the sender and delete the message. 

NDS8 does not accept responsibility for changes made to this 
message after it was sent. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to 
avoid the transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the 
recipient to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of 
this message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems
or data.

From Chris.Nevener at networkingpartner.com  Wed Jun  3 07:48:48 2009
From: Chris.Nevener at networkingpartner.com (Chris Nevener)
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:48:48 +0200
Subject: Antw: Re: DST vs GroupWise
In-Reply-To: <4A25AA2A020000BB0005F39B@mail2.nds8.com>
References: <4A255EDB.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
	<4A25AA2A020000BB0005F39B@mail2.nds8.com>
Message-ID: <4A2638EF.F9B1.005C.0@networkingpartner.com>

What is a DST volume? Daylight Saving Time??
 
Do we mean DFS? As in Distributed File System?
 
Greetz to Scottland
chris

>>> "Tim Heywood" <tim at nds8.co.uk> 02.06.2009 23:39 >>>
In principle there is no reason why a GW archive cannot be on a DST -
however practically it might well cause you loads of issues.  A GW
Archive is accessed by the GW client over NCP and therefore will only
see the whole (spliced) file system, but the response times might well
make life a little exciting

I would recommend avoiding DST for GroupWise archives if you can...

T


-- 

Tim Heywood
NDS8
Novell Platinum Solution Provider

Office:  +44 (0) 131 538 8202
Mobile:  +44 (0) 7974 134264








>>> On 02 June, 2009 at 22:18, "Michael Glenn" <MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us>
wrote: 
> ** High Priority **
> 
> Folks, I may have myself a bit of a situation here.
> 
> Today, I heard in passing that there may be a problem with GroupWise

> archiving on DST-enabled volumes. As I am partway through a migration
over to 
> DST of user spaces that are lousy with GW archives, this was not a
piece of 
> news that made me smile. 
> 
> Has anyone come across this? Confirm or deny? Work-arounds? Anything?
I'm 
> looking at a sleepless night here....
> 
> :'(
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Novell mailing list
> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 
> 
> ***Scanned by M+ Guardian***


The information contained in this email is intended for the person to 
whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. You should not copy, retain, forward or disclose its 
contents to anyone else, or take any action based upon it, if it is 
not addressed to you personally. If the message is received by anyone
other 
than the addressee, please notify the sender and delete the message. 

NDS8 does not accept responsibility for changes made to this 
message after it was sent. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to 
avoid the transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the 
recipient to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of 
this message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems
or data.
_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell

From tim at nds8.co.uk  Wed Jun  3 07:56:35 2009
From: tim at nds8.co.uk (Tim Heywood)
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:56:35 +0100
Subject: Antw: Re: DST vs GroupWise
In-Reply-To: <4A2638EF.F9B1.005C.0@networkingpartner.com>
References: <4A255EDB.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
	<4A25AA2A020000BB0005F39B@mail2.nds8.com>
	<4A2638EF.F9B1.005C.0@networkingpartner.com>
Message-ID: <4A262CB3020000BB0005F432@mail2.nds8.com>

Dynamic Storage Technology

HSM without the pain!  

http://www.novell.com/documentation/oes2/storage.html#b14wntyt

T
Greetings from Scotland
(God's Country!)




-- 
 
Tim Heywood
NDS8
Novell Platinum Solution Provider
 
Office:  +44 (0) 131 538 8202
Mobile:  +44 (0) 7974 134264








>>> On 03 June, 2009 at 07:48, "Chris Nevener"
<Chris.Nevener at networkingpartner.com> wrote: 
> What is a DST volume? Daylight Saving Time??
>  
> Do we mean DFS? As in Distributed File System?
>  
> Greetz to Scottland
> chris
> 
>>>> "Tim Heywood" <tim at nds8.co.uk> 02.06.2009 23:39 >>>
> In principle there is no reason why a GW archive cannot be on a DST
-
> however practically it might well cause you loads of issues.  A GW
> Archive is accessed by the GW client over NCP and therefore will
only
> see the whole (spliced) file system, but the response times might
well
> make life a little exciting
> 
> I would recommend avoiding DST for GroupWise archives if you can...
> 
> T


The information contained in this email is intended for the person to 
whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. You should not copy, retain, forward or disclose its 
contents to anyone else, or take any action based upon it, if it is 
not addressed to you personally. If the message is received by anyone
other 
than the addressee, please notify the sender and delete the message. 

NDS8 does not accept responsibility for changes made to this 
message after it was sent. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to 
avoid the transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the 
recipient to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of 
this message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems
or data.

From Chris.Nevener at networkingpartner.com  Wed Jun  3 08:01:52 2009
From: Chris.Nevener at networkingpartner.com (Chris Nevener)
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:01:52 +0200
Subject: Antw: Re: DST vs GroupWise
In-Reply-To: <4A262CB3020000BB0005F432@mail2.nds8.com>
References: <4A255EDB.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
	<4A25AA2A020000BB0005F39B@mail2.nds8.com>
	<4A2638EF.F9B1.005C.0@networkingpartner.com>
	<4A262CB3020000BB0005F432@mail2.nds8.com>
Message-ID: <4A263C00.F9B1.005C.0@networkingpartner.com>

Oh... I need coffee...
 
badly...
 


>>> "Tim Heywood" <tim at nds8.co.uk> 03.06.2009 08:56 >>>
Dynamic Storage Technology

HSM without the pain!  

http://www.novell.com/documentation/oes2/storage.html#b14wntyt 

T
Greetings from Scotland
(God's Country!)




-- 

Tim Heywood
NDS8
Novell Platinum Solution Provider

Office:  +44 (0) 131 538 8202
Mobile:  +44 (0) 7974 134264








>>> On 03 June, 2009 at 07:48, "Chris Nevener"
<Chris.Nevener at networkingpartner.com> wrote: 
> What is a DST volume? Daylight Saving Time??
>  
> Do we mean DFS? As in Distributed File System?
>  
> Greetz to Scottland
> chris
> 
>>>> "Tim Heywood" <tim at nds8.co.uk> 02.06.2009 23:39 >>>
> In principle there is no reason why a GW archive cannot be on a DST
-
> however practically it might well cause you loads of issues.  A GW
> Archive is accessed by the GW client over NCP and therefore will
only
> see the whole (spliced) file system, but the response times might
well
> make life a little exciting
> 
> I would recommend avoiding DST for GroupWise archives if you can...
> 
> T


The information contained in this email is intended for the person to 
whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. You should not copy, retain, forward or disclose its 
contents to anyone else, or take any action based upon it, if it is 
not addressed to you personally. If the message is received by anyone
other 
than the addressee, please notify the sender and delete the message. 

NDS8 does not accept responsibility for changes made to this 
message after it was sent. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to 
avoid the transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the 
recipient to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of 
this message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems
or data.
_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell

From joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk  Wed Jun  3 10:12:59 2009
From: joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk (Joe Doupnik)
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:12:59 +0100
Subject: DST vs GroupWise
In-Reply-To: <4A255EDB.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
References: <4A255EDB.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
Message-ID: <4A263E9B.80105@oucs.ox.ac.uk>

Michael Glenn wrote:
> ** High Priority **
> 
> Folks, I may have myself a bit of a situation here.
> 
> Today, I heard in passing that there may be a problem with GroupWise archiving on DST-enabled volumes. As I am partway through a migration over to DST of user spaces that are lousy with GW archives, this was not a piece of news that made me smile. 
> 
> Has anyone come across this? Confirm or deny? Work-arounds? Anything? I'm looking at a sleepless night here....
> 
> :'(
-------------
	I think you can provide your own analysis based on what you see. Here is the underlying
theory --
	DST stores recently changed files on the foreground volume, and it allows older
material to be migrated to the background volume (under your control typically via policies).
The nasty part is if a GW archive consists of multiple files, some touched recently and
others not. These can be on different volumes. So far, no problem for users. It is the
system level backup process which concerns us because it may well deal with physical volumes
rather than looking at the file system via NCP, thus seeing two volumes rather than one
merged one. We do not neglect appearance of new lock files and their typical storage spot#
on the foreground volume.
	So, have a look at the set of files involved and I think you will have the answer
you need.
	Joe D.

From MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us  Wed Jun  3 17:12:16 2009
From: MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us (Michael Glenn)
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:12:16 -0400
Subject: DST vs GroupWise
In-Reply-To: <4A263E9B.80105@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
References: <4A255EDB.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
	<4A263E9B.80105@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <4A2668A0.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>

"It is the system level backup process which concerns us because it may well deal with physical volumes
rather than looking at the file system via NCP, thus seeing two volumes rather than one merged one."

Aha; that clears it up immensely. Okay. Armed with that caveat, I can handle this. 

Thanks.

>>> Joe Doupnik <joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk> 06/03/2009 05:12 >>>
Michael Glenn wrote:
> ** High Priority **
> 
> Folks, I may have myself a bit of a situation here.
> 
> Today, I heard in passing that there may be a problem with GroupWise archiving on DST-enabled volumes. As I am partway through a migration over to DST of user spaces that are lousy with GW archives, this was not a piece of news that made me smile. 
> 
> Has anyone come across this? Confirm or deny? Work-arounds? Anything? I'm looking at a sleepless night here....
> 
> :'(
-------------
	I think you can provide your own analysis based on what you see. Here is the underlying
theory --
	DST stores recently changed files on the foreground volume, and it allows older
material to be migrated to the background volume (under your control typically via policies).
The nasty part is if a GW archive consists of multiple files, some touched recently and
others not. These can be on different volumes. So far, no problem for users. It is the
system level backup process which concerns us because it may well deal with physical volumes
rather than looking at the file system via NCP, thus seeing two volumes rather than one
merged one. We do not neglect appearance of new lock files and their typical storage spot#
on the foreground volume.
	So, have a look at the set of files involved and I think you will have the answer
you need.
	Joe D.
_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell


From HPfeil at uca.edu  Wed Jun  3 17:29:00 2009
From: HPfeil at uca.edu (Hans Pfeil)
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:29:00 -0500
Subject: IPTables
Message-ID: <4A265E7D.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>

Hey all,

Running OES2SP1-LX.  I'm trying to allow all traffic from my backup server to communicate with it.  With the firewall ON it does not communicate.  With the firewall OFF it communicates just fine.  So, using iptables here is what I have:  iptables -A INPUT -s  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -j ACCEPT    It's not working.   What am I missing?   I'm totally new to this.  

Thanks all
-Hans



From joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk  Wed Jun  3 17:52:51 2009
From: joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk (jrd)
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:52:51 +0100
Subject: IPTables
In-Reply-To: <4A265E7D.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
References: <4A265E7D.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
Message-ID: <4A26AA63.8050203@oucs.ox.ac.uk>

Hans Pfeil wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Running OES2SP1-LX.  I'm trying to allow all traffic from my backup server to communicate with it.  With the firewall ON it does not communicate.  With the firewall OFF it communicates just fine.  So, using iptables here is what I have:  iptables -A INPUT -s  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -j ACCEPT    It's not working.   What am I missing?   I'm totally new to this.  
>
> Thanks all
> -Hans
>   
       The command is fine, but where it appears is critical. Chains are 
lists of rules,
control passing down a chain until an action is invoked.
       I don't use the SUSE firewall at all, but instead use my own far 
simpler
arrangement. Thus I can't advise on tinkering with the SUSE firewall. My own
is documented as a low cost product (http://www.mindworksuk.com).
       Joe D.

From ml at irmawi.de  Wed Jun  3 19:05:02 2009
From: ml at irmawi.de (Markus Winkler)
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:05:02 +0200
Subject: IPTables
In-Reply-To: <4A265E7D.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
References: <4A265E7D.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
Message-ID: <4A26BB4E.8080706@irmawi.de>

Hans,

On 03.06.2009 18:29 Hans Pfeil wrote:
> 
> Running OES2SP1-LX.  I'm trying to allow all traffic from my backup
> server to communicate with it.  With the firewall ON it does not
> communicate.  With the firewall OFF it communicates just fine.  So,
> using iptables here is what I have:  iptables -A INPUT -s
> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -j ACCEPT    It's not working.

Where/how did you use this command? On a simple command line? Or did you
 use it within YaST or so?

Could you please provide the output (in a shell) of:

# iptables -L -v -n

when the firewall is set to ON?

BTW: Like Joe, I also use my own firewall scripts and not SUSE firewall.
Much more simple.

Regards,
Markus

From jrd at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk  Wed Jun  3 19:52:43 2009
From: jrd at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk (Joe R. Doupnik)
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:52:43 +0100
Subject: IPTables
In-Reply-To: <4A26BB4E.8080706@irmawi.de>
References: <4A265E7D.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu> <4A26BB4E.8080706@irmawi.de>
Message-ID: <4A26C67B.7050600@netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk>

Markus Winkler wrote:
> Hans,
>
> On 03.06.2009 18:29 Hans Pfeil wrote:
>   
>> Running OES2SP1-LX.  I'm trying to allow all traffic from my backup
>> server to communicate with it.  With the firewall ON it does not
>> communicate.  With the firewall OFF it communicates just fine.  So,
>> using iptables here is what I have:  iptables -A INPUT -s
>> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -j ACCEPT    It's not working.
>>     
>
> Where/how did you use this command? On a simple command line? Or did you
>  use it within YaST or so?
>
> Could you please provide the output (in a shell) of:
>
> # iptables -L -v -n
>
> when the firewall is set to ON?
>
> BTW: Like Joe, I also use my own firewall scripts and not SUSE firewall.
> Much more simple.
>
> Regards,
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> Novell mailing list
> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell
>   
---------
       As Markus and I say, just how you inserted the
rule is of prime importance. This also implies that we
think the SUSE firewall is rather more complicated than
mere mortals can decode. The YaST menus do help. We have
taken another approach, which was/is to invest our time
to understand the situation and then create much simpler
rules which are more easily understood and which match our
environments. This is not a simple thing to do at first,
so we are not recommending you follow that pathway. Instead,
it is very useful for you to know enough about IP filtering
to go about things in a productive way. Else, your frustration
will match ours of some time ago.
       You are started on the knowledge part, as demonstrated
by the rule you chose. That's good. Next is to see if the YAST
firewall menu will do what you need. If it does not then it is
time to dig into details, oh joy.
       Joe D.

From hpfeil at uca.edu  Fri Jun  5 21:47:20 2009
From: hpfeil at uca.edu (Hans Pfeil)
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:47:20 -0500
Subject: iptables
Message-ID: <4A293E08020000BD0006F944@GWIA1.uca.edu>

Markus,

Thanks for your reply.  Sorry about the late reply.  Here it is:

From ml at irmawi.de  Sat Jun  6 10:03:45 2009
From: ml at irmawi.de (Markus Winkler)
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 11:03:45 +0200
Subject: iptables
In-Reply-To: <4A293E08020000BD0006F944@GWIA1.uca.edu>
References: <4A293E08020000BD0006F944@GWIA1.uca.edu>
Message-ID: <4A2A30F1.40702@irmawi.de>

Hans,

On 05.06.2009 22:47 Hans Pfeil wrote:
> 
> Here it is:

nothing to see ... ;-)

Regards,
Markus

From HPfeil at uca.edu  Mon Jun  8 20:47:27 2009
From: HPfeil at uca.edu (Hans Pfeil)
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:47:27 -0500
Subject: iptables
In-Reply-To: <4A2A30F1.40702@irmawi.de>
References: <4A293E08020000BD0006F944@GWIA1.uca.edu> <4A2A30F1.40702@irmawi.de>
Message-ID: <4A2D247D.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>

Oops sorry, here is a retry.

-Hans




>>> Markus Winkler <ml at irmawi.de> 6/6/2009 4:03 AM >>>
Hans,

On 05.06.2009 22:47 Hans Pfeil wrote:
> 
> Here it is:

nothing to see ... ;-)

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: iptable.txt
URL: <http://netlab1.usu.edu/pipermail/novell/attachments/20090608/bd704ac2/attachment.txt>

From sdjones at weberpl.lib.ut.us  Mon Jun  8 23:57:48 2009
From: sdjones at weberpl.lib.ut.us (Scott Jones)
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:57:48 -0600
Subject: Migrate to dissimilar service pack
Message-ID: <4A2D4320.745E.0052.0@weberpl.lib.ut.us>

I've got an old server that is huffing its last breath.  It is an NW6.5 SP3 box.  

I am wondering if I can use the nwconfig NDS backup and restore options to go from the old hardware to a new VM running NW6.5 SP7?

I don't think the old hardware would stay up long enough to use the migration wizard.

Any insight is appreciated.

Thanks,
Scott


Scott D. Jones, CCNA, CNE, A+
Technology Director
Weber County Library System
2464 Jefferson Ave.
Ogden, UT   84401
v.801.337.2680
f.801.337.2680
sdjones at weberpl.org
http://www.weberpl.org


From alan at precise-computer.com  Tue Jun  9 03:50:17 2009
From: alan at precise-computer.com (Alan Downs)
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 21:50:17 -0500
Subject: Migrate to dissimilar service pack
In-Reply-To: 0MKoTA-1MDnno0Juc-000X6G
References: 0MKoTA-1MDnno0Juc-000X6G
Message-ID: <4A2D8799.E668.00DB.0@precise-computer.com>

Scott,

You might be better off building up a second server, adding it to the tree and putting a replica on it. Then to an NDS backup (just to be extra safe), and then see if you can migrate it to a VM. I wouldn't want to rely solely on the NDS backup and restore.

Alan

On 6/8/2009 at 5:57 PM, Scott Jones<sdjones at weberpl.lib.ut.us> wrote:

I've got an old server that is huffing its last breath.  It is an NW6.5 SP3 box.  

I am wondering if I can use the nwconfig NDS backup and restore options to go from the old hardware to a new VM running NW6.5 SP7?

I don't think the old hardware would stay up long enough to use the migration wizard.

Any insight is appreciated.

Thanks,
Scott


Scott D. Jones, CCNA, CNE, A+
Technology Director
Weber County Library System
2464 Jefferson Ave.
Ogden, UT   84401
v.801.337.2680
f.801.337.2680
sdjones at weberpl.org
http://www.weberpl.org

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell

From peschmid at mpsomaha.org  Tue Jun  9 14:32:43 2009
From: peschmid at mpsomaha.org (Patrick Schmidt)
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 08:32:43 -0500
Subject: Thoughts on ZCM 10.2?
Message-ID: <4A2E1E2B020000E4000747A6@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>

Greetings. We have held off upgrading our Zen 7 world to ZCM because of slow login times. We rely heavily on group policy and ZCM login times have been intolerably slow with GPO in effect. I upgraded my one remaining ZCM server to 10.2 and tested a login and it was still unacceptably slow (> 5 minutes) with even a single small workstation policy in the mix. I'm considering killing my server and starting from scratch, but only if I can save my database, which has considerable inventory-only data. Currently I'm running on SLES10 on a fairly beefy HP server. Part of the rationale there is that I could get rid of any programmatic remnants of the previous version of ZCM.

So, my big questions are: Does anyone have a related experience with ZCM 10.2? How are your login times? And what OS do most of you run, Win or SLES? I'd rather run it on Linux but Windows is not out of the question. Do you have OES on the ZCM server (I don't)?



From ducharme at escape.ca  Tue Jun  9 15:09:10 2009
From: ducharme at escape.ca (Mike Ducharme)
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:09:10 -0500
Subject: Thoughts on ZCM 10.2?
In-Reply-To: <4A2E1E2B020000E4000747A6@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>
References: <4A2E1E2B020000E4000747A6@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>
Message-ID: <4A2E6D06.2060602@escape.ca>

We have both Workstation and User policies.. the policies even with 
10.1.3 delayed our login by about 7-10 seconds.. 5 minutes seems a 
little excessive. Just upgraded to 10.2 and the change is not 
significant. We're running it on SLES, not OES.

Patrick Schmidt wrote:
> Greetings. We have held off upgrading our Zen 7 world to ZCM because of slow login times. We rely heavily on group policy and ZCM login times have been intolerably slow with GPO in effect. I upgraded my one remaining ZCM server to 10.2 and tested a login and it was still unacceptably slow (> 5 minutes) with even a single small workstation policy in the mix. I'm considering killing my server and starting from scratch, but only if I can save my database, which has considerable inventory-only data. Currently I'm running on SLES10 on a fairly beefy HP server. Part of the rationale there is that I could get rid of any programmatic remnants of the previous version of ZCM.
>
> So, my big questions are: Does anyone have a related experience with ZCM 10.2? How are your login times? And what OS do most of you run, Win or SLES? I'd rather run it on Linux but Windows is not out of the question. Do you have OES on the ZCM server (I don't)?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Novell mailing list
> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell
>
>   


From peschmid at mpsomaha.org  Tue Jun  9 15:14:24 2009
From: peschmid at mpsomaha.org (Patrick Schmidt)
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:14:24 -0500
Subject: Thoughts on ZCM 10.2?
In-Reply-To: <4A2E6D06.2060602@escape.ca>
References: <4A2E1E2B020000E4000747A6@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>
	<4A2E6D06.2060602@escape.ca>
Message-ID: <4A2E27F0020000E4000747B6@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>

That's encouraging. I'm learning how to save or recreate my inventory data and then I am going to whack the server. Don't care about the managed agents at this time. Do you mind if I email you off line in the next few days?




--------------------------------------------------
Patrick Schmidt
Millard Public Schools
Network Support Specialist
(402)715-6278
peschmid at mpsomaha.org 
--------------------------------------------------->>> Mike Ducharme <ducharme at escape.ca> 6/9/2009 9:09 AM >>>
We have both Workstation and User policies.. the policies even with 
10.1.3 delayed our login by about 7-10 seconds.. 5 minutes seems a 
little excessive. Just upgraded to 10.2 and the change is not 
significant. We're running it on SLES, not OES.

Patrick Schmidt wrote:
> Greetings. We have held off upgrading our Zen 7 world to ZCM because of slow login times. We rely heavily on group policy and ZCM login times have been intolerably slow with GPO in effect. I upgraded my one remaining ZCM server to 10.2 and tested a login and it was still unacceptably slow (> 5 minutes) with even a single small workstation policy in the mix. I'm considering killing my server and starting from scratch, but only if I can save my database, which has considerable inventory-only data. Currently I'm running on SLES10 on a fairly beefy HP server. Part of the rationale there is that I could get rid of any programmatic remnants of the previous version of ZCM.
>
> So, my big questions are: Does anyone have a related experience with ZCM 10.2? How are your login times? And what OS do most of you run, Win or SLES? I'd rather run it on Linux but Windows is not out of the question. Do you have OES on the ZCM server (I don't)?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Novell mailing list
> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell


From bbrush at gmail.com  Tue Jun  9 15:19:39 2009
From: bbrush at gmail.com (Bill Brush)
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:19:39 -0500
Subject: Thoughts on ZCM 10.2?
In-Reply-To: <4A2E27F0020000E4000747B6@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>
References: <4A2E1E2B020000E4000747A6@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>
	<4A2E6D06.2060602@escape.ca>
	<4A2E27F0020000E4000747B6@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>
Message-ID: <167f4090906090719w7fdaacb8ua50b4b329d477357@mail.gmail.com>

I would encourage you to visit the ZCM forum at Novell's site.  Shaun
Pond is a long-time Zen guru and he posts there daily.  If you have a
problem with long login times I would bet someone else had the problem
too and there's some info on it out there.

Bill

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Patrick Schmidt<peschmid at mpsomaha.org> wrote:
> That's encouraging. I'm learning how to save or recreate my inventory data and then I am going to whack the server. Don't care about the managed agents at this time. Do you mind if I email you off line in the next few days?
>
>

From ducharme at escape.ca  Wed Jun 10 03:26:24 2009
From: ducharme at escape.ca (Mike Ducharme)
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:26:24 -0500
Subject: Thoughts on ZCM 10.2?
In-Reply-To: <4A2E27F0020000E4000747B6@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>
References: <4A2E1E2B020000E4000747A6@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>	<4A2E6D06.2060602@escape.ca>
	<4A2E27F0020000E4000747B6@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>
Message-ID: <4A2F19D0.2050505@escape.ca>

Sure, that's fine.

Patrick Schmidt wrote:
> That's encouraging. I'm learning how to save or recreate my inventory data and then I am going to whack the server. Don't care about the managed agents at this time. Do you mind if I email you off line in the next few days?
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Patrick Schmidt
> Millard Public Schools
> Network Support Specialist
> (402)715-6278
> peschmid at mpsomaha.org 
> --------------------------------------------------->>> Mike Ducharme <ducharme at escape.ca> 6/9/2009 9:09 AM >>>
> We have both Workstation and User policies.. the policies even with 
> 10.1.3 delayed our login by about 7-10 seconds.. 5 minutes seems a 
> little excessive. Just upgraded to 10.2 and the change is not 
> significant. We're running it on SLES, not OES.
>
> Patrick Schmidt wrote:
>   
>> Greetings. We have held off upgrading our Zen 7 world to ZCM because of slow login times. We rely heavily on group policy and ZCM login times have been intolerably slow with GPO in effect. I upgraded my one remaining ZCM server to 10.2 and tested a login and it was still unacceptably slow (> 5 minutes) with even a single small workstation policy in the mix. I'm considering killing my server and starting from scratch, but only if I can save my database, which has considerable inventory-only data. Currently I'm running on SLES10 on a fairly beefy HP server. Part of the rationale there is that I could get rid of any programmatic remnants of the previous version of ZCM.
>>
>> So, my big questions are: Does anyone have a related experience with ZCM 10.2? How are your login times? And what OS do most of you run, Win or SLES? I'd rather run it on Linux but Windows is not out of the question. Do you have OES on the ZCM server (I don't)?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Novell mailing list
>> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
>> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 
>>
>>   
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Novell mailing list
> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell
>
> _______________________________________________
> Novell mailing list
> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell
>
>   


From toomas.aas at raad.tartu.ee  Wed Jun 10 08:10:03 2009
From: toomas.aas at raad.tartu.ee (Toomas Aas)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:10:03 +0300
Subject: iPrint and eDirectory 8.8 SP5
Message-ID: <4A2F5C4B.7050802@raad.tartu.ee>

Hello!

We are currently running eDirectory 8.7.3.10 on our NW65SP8 server, but I'm 
now considering upgrading to eDirectory 8.8 SP5

When checking TID7003446 (http://lnk.nu/novell.com/wwv.do) for 
compatibility information, I found this interesting passage.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Novell iPrint v5.19
	
iPrint 5.16 and later support  does supported 8.8 SP3, 8.8SP4 and 8.8SP5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

What are iPrint 5.16 and 5.19? In nwconfig under installed products I have 
iPrint 4.0.3, iPrint client that I have is 5.12. I can't find anything 
newer on download.novell.com.

If anyone is successfully running iPrint with eDirectory 8.8 SP5, what 
versions do you have?

-- 
Toomas Aas

From Joop.vanBuuren at etten-leur.nl  Wed Jun 10 10:18:51 2009
From: Joop.vanBuuren at etten-leur.nl (Joop van Buuren)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:18:51 +0200
Subject: Thoughts on ZCM 10.2?
In-Reply-To: <4A2E1E2B020000E4000747A6@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>
Message-ID: <97A54859C42E584887B4A1EEBA10E5E30102B158DD9E@EL-CL-MAIL01.gemeentehuis.etten-leur.nl>

Patrick,

We are now setting up ZCM 10, 2 servers (just installed SP2) We are on Windows 2003 SP2 (VM on ESX) separate SQL database on other Windows box. Converting and testing our apps from Zenworks 4 right now. So far no slow logins. We had some but after e really good check of DNS it seems to be solved. Healty DNS is very important for ZCM 10.

Hope this helps, if you have any questions email me.


Joop van Buuren
Systeem en Netwerkbeheerder I
Gemeente Etten-Leur
Roosendaalseweg 4
4875 AA ETTEN-LEUR
Tel: 076 - 5024382
GSM: 0615075508
mailto:Joop.vanBuuren at etten-leur.nl

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: novell-bounces at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [mailto:novell-bounces at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk] Namens Patrick Schmidt
Verzonden: dinsdag 9 juni 2009 15:33
Aan: Novell LAN Interest Group <novell at netlab1.usu.edu
Onderwerp: Thoughts on ZCM 10.2?

Greetings. We have held off upgrading our Zen 7 world to ZCM because of slow login times. We rely heavily on group policy and ZCM login times have been intolerably slow with GPO in effect. I upgraded my one remaining ZCM server to 10.2 and tested a login and it was still unacceptably slow (> 5 minutes) with even a single small workstation policy in the mix. I'm considering killing my server and starting from scratch, but only if I can save my database, which has considerable inventory-only data. Currently I'm running on SLES10 on a fairly beefy HP server. Part of the rationale there is that I could get rid of any programmatic remnants of the previous version of ZCM.

So, my big questions are: Does anyone have a related experience with ZCM 10.2? How are your login times? And what OS do most of you run, Win or SLES? I'd rather run it on Linux but Windows is not out of the question. Do you have OES on the ZCM server (I don't)?


_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell

*************************DISCLAIMER*************************
Deze e-mail is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n).
Verstrekking aan en gebruik door anderen is niet toegestaan.
Gemeente Etten-Leur sluit iedere aansprakelijkheid uit die
voortvloeit uit elektronische verzending

This e-mail is intended exclusively for the addressee(s),
and may not be passed on to, or made available for use by
any person other than the addressee(s)
Gemeente Etten-Leur rules out any and every liability
resulting from any electronic transmission.
************************************************************

From peschmid at mpsomaha.org  Wed Jun 10 13:30:51 2009
From: peschmid at mpsomaha.org (Patrick Schmidt)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:30:51 -0500
Subject: Thoughts on ZCM 10.2?
In-Reply-To: <97A54859C42E584887B4A1EEBA10E5E30102B158DD9E@EL-CL-MAIL01.gemeentehuis.etten-leur.nl>
References: <4A2E1E2B020000E4000747A6@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>
	<97A54859C42E584887B4A1EEBA10E5E30102B158DD9E@EL-CL-MAIL01.gemeentehuis.etten-leur.nl>
Message-ID: <4A2F612B020000E4000748CC@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>

Thanks for everyone's input. It sounds like slow logins are fixed in sp2, so I've still got a problem to solve. I did some digging yesterday and found that inventory only agents will register with a "new" server if it has the same dns name, IP address and Zone name. Since we have not deployed managed agents yet due to slow logins, I'm going to whack the server, reinstall with SLES11 and ZCM 10.2 and we should be off and running. In theory anyway.




--------------------------------------------------
Patrick Schmidt
Millard Public Schools
Network Support Specialist
(402)715-6278
peschmid at mpsomaha.org 
--------------------------------------------------->>> Joop van Buuren <Joop.vanBuuren at etten-leur.nl> 6/10/2009 4:18 AM >>>
Patrick,

We are now setting up ZCM 10, 2 servers (just installed SP2) We are on Windows 2003 SP2 (VM on ESX) separate SQL database on other Windows box. Converting and testing our apps from Zenworks 4 right now. So far no slow logins. We had some but after e really good check of DNS it seems to be solved. Healty DNS is very important for ZCM 10.

Hope this helps, if you have any questions email me.


Joop van Buuren
Systeem en Netwerkbeheerder I
Gemeente Etten-Leur
Roosendaalseweg 4
4875 AA ETTEN-LEUR
Tel: 076 - 5024382
GSM: 0615075508
mailto:Joop.vanBuuren at etten-leur.nl 

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: novell-bounces at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [mailto:novell-bounces at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk] Namens Patrick Schmidt
Verzonden: dinsdag 9 juni 2009 15:33
Aan: Novell LAN Interest Group <novell at netlab1.usu.edu 
Onderwerp: Thoughts on ZCM 10.2?

Greetings. We have held off upgrading our Zen 7 world to ZCM because of slow login times. We rely heavily on group policy and ZCM login times have been intolerably slow with GPO in effect. I upgraded my one remaining ZCM server to 10.2 and tested a login and it was still unacceptably slow (> 5 minutes) with even a single small workstation policy in the mix. I'm considering killing my server and starting from scratch, but only if I can save my database, which has considerable inventory-only data. Currently I'm running on SLES10 on a fairly beefy HP server. Part of the rationale there is that I could get rid of any programmatic remnants of the previous version of ZCM.

So, my big questions are: Does anyone have a related experience with ZCM 10.2? How are your login times? And what OS do most of you run, Win or SLES? I'd rather run it on Linux but Windows is not out of the question. Do you have OES on the ZCM server (I don't)?


_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 

*************************DISCLAIMER*************************
Deze e-mail is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n).
Verstrekking aan en gebruik door anderen is niet toegestaan.
Gemeente Etten-Leur sluit iedere aansprakelijkheid uit die
voortvloeit uit elektronische verzending

This e-mail is intended exclusively for the addressee(s),
and may not be passed on to, or made available for use by
any person other than the addressee(s)
Gemeente Etten-Leur rules out any and every liability
resulting from any electronic transmission.
************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell


From ducharme at escape.ca  Wed Jun 10 14:35:25 2009
From: ducharme at escape.ca (Mike Ducharme)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:35:25 -0500
Subject: Thoughts on ZCM 10.2?
In-Reply-To: <4A2F612B020000E4000748CC@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>
References: <4A2E1E2B020000E4000747A6@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>	<97A54859C42E584887B4A1EEBA10E5E30102B158DD9E@EL-CL-MAIL01.gemeentehuis.etten-leur.nl>
	<4A2F612B020000E4000748CC@groupwise.mpsomaha.org>
Message-ID: <4A2FB69D.7040000@escape.ca>

You might want to backup the current zenworks certificate to a file 
first just to be safe.. I think the command is zac cae

If the inventory-only agents end up wanting the certificate to match, 
you can easily restore the certificate on the new server after 
installation with the matching restore command. That will allow your 
managed agents to continue working as well.

Mike

Patrick Schmidt wrote:
> Thanks for everyone's input. It sounds like slow logins are fixed in sp2, so I've still got a problem to solve. I did some digging yesterday and found that inventory only agents will register with a "new" server if it has the same dns name, IP address and Zone name. Since we have not deployed managed agents yet due to slow logins, I'm going to whack the server, reinstall with SLES11 and ZCM 10.2 and we should be off and running. In theory anyway.
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Patrick Schmidt
> Millard Public Schools
> Network Support Specialist
> (402)715-6278
> peschmid at mpsomaha.org 
> --------------------------------------------------->>> Joop van Buuren <Joop.vanBuuren at etten-leur.nl> 6/10/2009 4:18 AM >>>
> Patrick,
>
> We are now setting up ZCM 10, 2 servers (just installed SP2) We are on Windows 2003 SP2 (VM on ESX) separate SQL database on other Windows box. Converting and testing our apps from Zenworks 4 right now. So far no slow logins. We had some but after e really good check of DNS it seems to be solved. Healty DNS is very important for ZCM 10.
>
> Hope this helps, if you have any questions email me.
>
>
> Joop van Buuren
> Systeem en Netwerkbeheerder I
> Gemeente Etten-Leur
> Roosendaalseweg 4
> 4875 AA ETTEN-LEUR
> Tel: 076 - 5024382
> GSM: 0615075508
> mailto:Joop.vanBuuren at etten-leur.nl 
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: novell-bounces at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [mailto:novell-bounces at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk] Namens Patrick Schmidt
> Verzonden: dinsdag 9 juni 2009 15:33
> Aan: Novell LAN Interest Group <novell at netlab1.usu.edu 
> Onderwerp: Thoughts on ZCM 10.2?
>
> Greetings. We have held off upgrading our Zen 7 world to ZCM because of slow login times. We rely heavily on group policy and ZCM login times have been intolerably slow with GPO in effect. I upgraded my one remaining ZCM server to 10.2 and tested a login and it was still unacceptably slow (> 5 minutes) with even a single small workstation policy in the mix. I'm considering killing my server and starting from scratch, but only if I can save my database, which has considerable inventory-only data. Currently I'm running on SLES10 on a fairly beefy HP server. Part of the rationale there is that I could get rid of any programmatic remnants of the previous version of ZCM.
>
> So, my big questions are: Does anyone have a related experience with ZCM 10.2? How are your login times? And what OS do most of you run, Win or SLES? I'd rather run it on Linux but Windows is not out of the question. Do you have OES on the ZCM server (I don't)?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Novell mailing list
> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 
>
> *************************DISCLAIMER*************************
> Deze e-mail is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n).
> Verstrekking aan en gebruik door anderen is niet toegestaan.
> Gemeente Etten-Leur sluit iedere aansprakelijkheid uit die
> voortvloeit uit elektronische verzending
>
> This e-mail is intended exclusively for the addressee(s),
> and may not be passed on to, or made available for use by
> any person other than the addressee(s)
> Gemeente Etten-Leur rules out any and every liability
> resulting from any electronic transmission.
> ************************************************************
> _______________________________________________
> Novell mailing list
> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell
>
> _______________________________________________
> Novell mailing list
> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell
>
>   


From ml at irmawi.de  Wed Jun 10 17:29:31 2009
From: ml at irmawi.de (Markus Winkler)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:29:31 +0200
Subject: iptables
In-Reply-To: <4A2D247D.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
References: <4A293E08020000BD0006F944@GWIA1.uca.edu>
	<4A2A30F1.40702@irmawi.de> <4A2D247D.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
Message-ID: <4A2FDF6B.9040309@irmawi.de>

On 08.06.2009 21:47 Hans Pfeil wrote:
> Oops sorry, here is a retry.

Thanks!

On 03.06.2009 18:29 Hans Pfeil wrote:

>>> With the firewall ON it does not communicate. With the firewall
>>> OFF it communicates just fine. So, using iptables here is what I
>>> have: iptables -A INPUT -s xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -j ACCEPT It's not
>>> working.

Could you please use (with the firewall switched ON):

iptables -I INPUT -s xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -j ACCEPT

(where xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the IP address of your backup server)

And then test if they can communicate. And please send the output of
iptables -L INPUT -v -n

Let's see.

Regards,
Markus

From alandpearson at yahoo.com  Fri Jun 12 15:04:30 2009
From: alandpearson at yahoo.com (Alan Pearson)
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:04:30 +0100
Subject: File ownership / migration again
Message-ID: <7E06A4C2-FA2B-458A-8BB0-43594B5E7FE6@yahoo.com>

All,

If you remember I posted a question some months ago about migrating  
files from an OS/X server to NSS on Linux and wanting to keep file  
ownership for quota reasons.
Some useful suggestions were posted, which I'll summarise :

1) Use migration utilities in OES that are used for Windows servers
Tried this, failed. The utility was pretty bad, and kept failing.
No go.

2) Use jrb utilities to do the job
This would have worked, and big thanks to John for his help, but  
required a windows box to run them on and some crazy batch scripting.
However, homes.exe would have worked perfectly if these had have been  
home dirs


So, after seeing this article :

http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/tools/18565.html

I saw that the _Admin volume could easily be used for some great  
magic....

I wrote a perl script to get all the Unix files owners in the Apple  
system for each file, and lookup using eDir LDAP the eDir DN of the  
user in eDirectory.
Obviously this relies on the usernames being the same.

Then I rsync'ed the data to the NSS volume and wrote another perl  
script based on above, that sets the creator, archiver, modifier to be  
the correct eDir user by poking commands at the admin volume.
This all worked really well, and all quotas were updated etc.



If anyone would like the scripts, shout and I'll email them to you


Cheers for all your help guys !



---
AlanP



From jdustin at usm.maine.edu  Fri Jun 12 15:20:42 2009
From: jdustin at usm.maine.edu (Jon Dustin)
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:20:42 -0400
Subject: IPTables
Message-ID: <4A322BFA0200008D0001E7DF@uct5.uct.usm.maine.edu>

>>> On 6/3/2009 at 12:29 PM, in message <4A3260A0.297 : 26 : 21143>, "Hans Pfeil"
<HPfeil at uca.edu> wrote:
> Hey all,
> 
> Running OES2SP1-LX.  I'm trying to allow all traffic from my backup server to 
> communicate with it.  With the firewall ON it does not communicate.  With the 
> firewall OFF it communicates just fine.  So, using iptables here is what I 
> have:  iptables -A INPUT -s  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -j ACCEPT    It's not working.   
> What am I missing?   I'm totally new to this.  
> 

As you have already heard, there are LOTS of ways to use IPTABLES. I have spent some time to learn "the SUSE way", and it is not terribly difficult.

- edit the firewall config file: /etc/sysconfig/SuSEfirewall2

- look for the FW_TRUSTED_NETS section

- add your backup server there like so:

FW_TRUSTED_NETS="192.168.0.5"

You may also use this section to specify protocol/ports and networks as well:

FW_TRUSTED_NETS="192.168.0.0/24 192.168.1.10,tcp,80"

Once you have saved this file, activate it via: /sbin/rcSuSEfirewall2 reload

Good luck!

-- 

 
Jon Dustin - Network Specialist
University of Southern Maine
Portland, ME  207-780-4152



From TJohnson at lancaster.wnyric.org  Fri Jun 19 19:59:06 2009
From: TJohnson at lancaster.wnyric.org (TJohnson at lancaster.wnyric.org)
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:59:06 -0400
Subject: Migrating Data with SCMT without trustees
Message-ID: <OFA78C91BC.A08C1A73-ON852575DA.006817E7-852575DA.00684AA4@lancaster.wnyric.org>


I posted this on the TTP list but figured I would see if anyone had any
suggestions here:

We are planning on using the Server Consolidation and Migration Utility to
migrate data from our present NW 6.5.7
tree to a new OES2 Linux tree and we are completely reorganizing our file
system rights structure so we want to migrate the data without trustee
since these will also be changing.  Is there a way to migrate data using
SCMT without trustee information?  We are only interested in preserving
file attributes.

Thanks.

T2

Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission is intended for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. This message may contain confidential student or personnel data or an attorney-client communication and as such is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message and any attached documents in error, that any review, dissemination/disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message and documents. Thank you for your cooperation.

From James.Taylor at eastcobbgroup.com  Fri Jun 19 20:39:20 2009
From: James.Taylor at eastcobbgroup.com (James Taylor)
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:39:20 -0400
Subject: Migrating Data with SCMT without trustees
In-Reply-To: <OFA78C91BC.A08C1A73-ON852575DA.006817E7-852575DA.00684AA4@lancaster.wnyric.org>
References: <OFA78C91BC.A08C1A73-ON852575DA.006817E7-852575DA.00684AA4@lancaster.wnyric.org>
Message-ID: <4A3BB128020000750005106F@inet.eastcobbgroup.com>

As I recall, it is one of the options when you start the sync process.
-jt
 
 

James Taylor
The East Cobb Group, Inc.
678-697-9420
james.taylor at eastcobbgroup.com
http://www.eastcobbgroup.com




>>> <TJohnson at lancaster.wnyric.org> 6/19/2009 02:59 PM >>> 

I posted this on the TTP list but figured I would see if anyone had any
suggestions here:

We are planning on using the Server Consolidation and Migration Utility to
migrate data from our present NW 6.5.7
tree to a new OES2 Linux tree and we are completely reorganizing our file
system rights structure so we want to migrate the data without trustee
since these will also be changing.  Is there a way to migrate data using
SCMT without trustee information?  We are only interested in preserving
file attributes.

Thanks.

T2

Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission is intended for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. This message may contain confidential student or personnel data or an attorney-client communication and as such is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message and any attached documents in error, that any review, dissemination/disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message and documents. Thank you for your cooperation.
_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell



From TJohnson at lancaster.wnyric.org  Fri Jun 19 21:12:04 2009
From: TJohnson at lancaster.wnyric.org (TJohnson at lancaster.wnyric.org)
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:12:04 -0400
Subject: Migrating Data with SCMT without trustees
In-Reply-To: <4A3BB128020000750005106F@inet.eastcobbgroup.com>
References: <OFA78C91BC.A08C1A73-ON852575DA.006817E7-852575DA.00684AA4@lancaster.wnyric.org>
	<4A3BB128020000750005106F@inet.eastcobbgroup.com>
Message-ID: <OF8B1908B6.698A5364-ON852575DA.006EDC40-852575DA.006EF8D2@lancaster.wnyric.org>

Thanks JT, it has been about 4 years since I have used SCMT of any version
or flavor I will give it a try and see.

T2


                                                                           
             "James Taylor"                                                
             <James.Taylor at eas                                             
             tcobbgroup.com>                                            To 
             Sent by:                  "Novell LAN Interest Group"         
             novell-bounces at ne         <novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk>      
             tlab1.oucs.ox.ac.                                          cc 
             uk                                                            
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: Migrating Data with SCMT        
             06/19/2009 03:40          without trustees                    
             PM                                                            
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
                Novell LAN                                                 
              Interest Group                                               
             <novell at netlab1.o                                             
               ucs.ox.ac.uk>                                               
                                                                           
                                                                           




As I recall, it is one of the options when you start the sync process.
-jt



James Taylor
The East Cobb Group, Inc.
678-697-9420
james.taylor at eastcobbgroup.com
http://www.eastcobbgroup.com




>>> <TJohnson at lancaster.wnyric.org> 6/19/2009 02:59 PM >>>

I posted this on the TTP list but figured I would see if anyone had any
suggestions here:

We are planning on using the Server Consolidation and Migration Utility to
migrate data from our present NW 6.5.7
tree to a new OES2 Linux tree and we are completely reorganizing our file
system rights structure so we want to migrate the data without trustee
since these will also be changing.  Is there a way to migrate data using
SCMT without trustee information?  We are only interested in preserving
file attributes.

Thanks.

T2

Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission is intended for
the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named
above. This message may contain confidential student or personnel data or
an attorney-client communication and as such is privileged and
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this message and any attached documents in
error, that any review, dissemination/disclosure, copying, distribution, or
taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original
message and documents. Thank you for your cooperation.
_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell


_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell


--
BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
------------------------------------------------------

Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 196025169) is spam:
Spam:
http://milton1.wnyric.org/canit/b.php?i=196025169&m=bc4b14cf46ad&c=s
Not spam:
http://milton1.wnyric.org/canit/b.php?i=196025169&m=bc4b14cf46ad&c=n
Forget vote:
http://milton1.wnyric.org/canit/b.php?i=196025169&m=bc4b14cf46ad&c=f
------------------------------------------------------
END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS



Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission is intended for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. This message may contain confidential student or personnel data or an attorney-client communication and as such is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message and any attached documents in error, that any review, dissemination/disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message and documents. Thank you for your cooperation.

From PHasenjager at kcumb.edu  Mon Jun 22 22:08:04 2009
From: PHasenjager at kcumb.edu (Patrick Hasenjager)
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:08:04 -0500
Subject: OES2 Linux - NoRM
Message-ID: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>

We are in the process of putting our first OES2 Linux server online.  We are having a problem logging into NoRM.  We can login successfully as "root," but not as any eDirectory user.
 
If we attempt to login as the username only (i.e. phasenjager), it states invalid username or password.  If we attempt to login with the full context, it kills the novell-httpstkd process.  I have scoured the forums and support site, but could not find anything useful.  LUM is enabled on this server, and if I run an "id phasenjager" command, I get the appropriate response with the group memberships, etc.  I cannot come up with any other reason for this problem.
 
Any suggestions of where to look?
 
 
Patrick A. Hasenjager
Network Administrator
Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences
 
phone 816.283.2478
fax 816.283.0692
email phasenjager at kcumb.edu

From alan at precise-computer.com  Mon Jun 22 22:22:46 2009
From: alan at precise-computer.com (Alan Downs)
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:22:46 -0500
Subject: OES2 Linux - NoRM
In-Reply-To: 0MKoXI-1MIqks3p7D-000XJL
References: 0MKoXI-1MIqks3p7D-000XJL
Message-ID: <4A3FAFD6.E668.00DB.0@precise-computer.com>

Patrick,

I would suggest looking at LDAP to make sure that it's looking in the right contexts and that you have a properly configured LDAP proxy user.



On 6/22/2009 at 4:08 PM, Patrick Hasenjager<PHasenjager at kcumb.edu> wrote:

We are in the process of putting our first OES2 Linux server online.  We are having a problem logging into NoRM.  We can login successfully as "root," but not as any eDirectory user.

If we attempt to login as the username only (i.e. phasenjager), it states invalid username or password.  If we attempt to login with the full context, it kills the novell-httpstkd process.  I have scoured the forums and support site, but could not find anything useful.  LUM is enabled on this server, and if I run an "id phasenjager" command, I get the appropriate response with the group memberships, etc.  I cannot come up with any other reason for this problem.

Any suggestions of where to look?


Patrick A. Hasenjager
Network Administrator
Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences

phone 816.283.2478
fax 816.283.0692
email phasenjager at kcumb.edu
_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell

From evansj21 at msu.edu  Mon Jun 22 23:34:17 2009
From: evansj21 at msu.edu (John Evans)
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:34:17 -0400
Subject: OES2 Linux - NoRM
In-Reply-To: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>
References: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>
Message-ID: <4A3FCEA6.42FE.0085.0@MAIL.HFS.MSU.EDU>

Patrick,
 
Check and recheck LDAP settings on your problem server.  We had a similar situation here on one server.  The IP address for the LDAP source was correct when the server was installed but that address was later changed.  Once the address of the source server was changed, the problem cropped up.  Turns out, it was the only server pointing to that old IP address....
 
...John
 

>>> "Patrick Hasenjager" <PHasenjager at kcumb.edu> 6/22/2009 5:08 PM >>>
We are in the process of putting our first OES2 Linux server online.  We are having a problem logging into NoRM.  We can login successfully as "root," but not as any eDirectory user.

If we attempt to login as the username only (i.e. phasenjager), it states invalid username or password.  If we attempt to login with the full context, it kills the novell-httpstkd process.  I have scoured the forums and support site, but could not find anything useful.  LUM is enabled on this server, and if I run an "id phasenjager" command, I get the appropriate response with the group memberships, etc.  I cannot come up with any other reason for this problem.

Any suggestions of where to look?


Patrick A. Hasenjager
Network Administrator
Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences

phone 816.283.2478
fax 816.283.0692
email phasenjager at kcumb.edu 
_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell

From joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk  Tue Jun 23 09:23:39 2009
From: joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk (Joe R. Doupnik)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:23:39 +0100
Subject: OES2 Linux - NoRM
In-Reply-To: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>
References: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>
Message-ID: <4A40910B.3040502@oucs.ox.ac.uk>

Patrick Hasenjager wrote:
> We are in the process of putting our first OES2 Linux server online.  We are having a problem logging into NoRM.  We can login successfully as "root," but not as any eDirectory user.
>  
> If we attempt to login as the username only (i.e. phasenjager), it states invalid username or password.  If we attempt to login with the full context, it kills the novell-httpstkd process.  I have scoured the forums and support site, but could not find anything useful.  LUM is enabled on this server, and if I run an "id phasenjager" command, I get the appropriate response with the group memberships, etc.  I cannot come up with any other reason for this problem.
>  
> Any suggestions of where to look?
>  
>  
> Patrick A. Hasenjager
> Network Administrator
> Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences
>  
> phone 816.283.2478
> fax 816.283.0692
> email phasenjager at kcumb.edu
---------------
	My best guess with little info is something is
peculiar with the manner in which you put the machine
together. One pitfall is installing SLES 10, patching it,
and later adding OES2. If you did that then I suggest
starting over and avoid patching until both halves are
installed. Otherwise we would need to know more about
how the server was constructed.
	Joe D.

From rockp at Cardiff.ac.uk  Tue Jun 23 09:54:07 2009
From: rockp at Cardiff.ac.uk (Paul Rock)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:54:07 +0100
Subject: OES2 Linux - NoRM
In-Reply-To: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>
References: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>
Message-ID: <4A40A63F.D335.0084.1@groupwise.cf.ac.uk>

> We are in the process of putting our first OES2 Linux server online.  We are 
> having a problem logging into NoRM.  We can login successfully as "root," but 
> not as any eDirectory user.
>  
> If we attempt to login as the username only (i.e. phasenjager), it states 
> invalid username or password.  If we attempt to login with the full context, 
> it kills the novell-httpstkd process.  I have scoured the forums and support 
> site, but could not find anything useful.  LUM is enabled on this server, and 
> if I run an "id phasenjager" command, I get the appropriate response with the 
> group memberships, etc.  I cannot come up with any other reason for this 
> problem.
>  
> Any suggestions of where to look?

I think the users need to be LUM-enabled. (grrrr - oh how I hate LUM...)

- Paul


From L.C.Alexander at herts.ac.uk  Tue Jun 23 12:07:28 2009
From: L.C.Alexander at herts.ac.uk (Alexander, Larry)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:07:28 +0100
Subject: OES2 Linux - NoRM
In-Reply-To: <4A3FCEA6.42FE.0085.0@MAIL.HFS.MSU.EDU>
References: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>
	<4A3FCEA6.42FE.0085.0@MAIL.HFS.MSU.EDU>
Message-ID: <249D31647A2E9244899D8E46B942846AAE4A35C898@UH-MAILSTOR.herts.ac.uk>

Hi

Another possibility (from http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/feature/17259.html )

On UNIX, edit the /etc/init.d/ndsd file and add these two lines before the StartNdsd() function:

NDSD_TRY_NMASLOGIN_FIRST=true

export NDSD_TRY_NMASLOGIN_FIRST


How is your login to iManager?

Regards


Larry C. Alexander
Systems & Applications Manager
University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Herts, AL10 9AB, UK
Tel: 01707-284703  Fax: 01707-284666  Mobile: 07734-540924



-----Original Message-----
From: novell-bounces at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [mailto:novell-bounces at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk] On Behalf Of John Evans
Sent: 22 June 2009 23:34
To: Novell LAN Interest Group
Subject: Re: OES2 Linux - NoRM

Patrick,

Check and recheck LDAP settings on your problem server.  We had a similar situation here on one server.  The IP address for the LDAP source was correct when the server was installed but that address was later changed.  Once the address of the source server was changed, the problem cropped up.  Turns out, it was the only server pointing to that old IP address....

...John


>>> "Patrick Hasenjager" <PHasenjager at kcumb.edu> 6/22/2009 5:08 PM >>>
We are in the process of putting our first OES2 Linux server online.  We are having a problem logging into NoRM.  We can login successfully as "root," but not as any eDirectory user.

If we attempt to login as the username only (i.e. phasenjager), it states invalid username or password.  If we attempt to login with the full context, it kills the novell-httpstkd process.  I have scoured the forums and support site, but could not find anything useful.  LUM is enabled on this server, and if I run an "id phasenjager" command, I get the appropriate response with the group memberships, etc.  I cannot come up with any other reason for this problem.

Any suggestions of where to look?


Patrick A. Hasenjager
Network Administrator
Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences

phone 816.283.2478
fax 816.283.0692
email phasenjager at kcumb.edu
_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell
_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell

From PHasenjager at kcumb.edu  Tue Jun 23 14:42:57 2009
From: PHasenjager at kcumb.edu (Patrick Hasenjager)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:42:57 -0500
Subject: OES2 Linux - NoRM
In-Reply-To: <4A40910B.3040502@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
References: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>
	<4A40910B.3040502@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <4A40959102000005001AC5F3@smtp.kcumb.edu>

The server was installed with an integrated SLES10 SP2/OES2 SP1 installation.  It was then patched to current levels.
 
Patrick A. Hasenjager
Network Administrator
Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences
 
phone 816.283.2478
fax 816.283.0692
email phasenjager at kcumb.edu


>>> On 6/23/2009 at 3:23 AM, "Joe R. Doupnik" <joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

Patrick Hasenjager wrote:
> We are in the process of putting our first OES2 Linux server online.  We are having a problem logging into NoRM.  We can login successfully as "root," but not as any eDirectory user.
>  
> If we attempt to login as the username only (i.e. phasenjager), it states invalid username or password.  If we attempt to login with the full context, it kills the novell-httpstkd process.  I have scoured the forums and support site, but could not find anything useful.  LUM is enabled on this server, and if I run an "id phasenjager" command, I get the appropriate response with the group memberships, etc.  I cannot come up with any other reason for this problem.
>  
> Any suggestions of where to look?
>  
>  
> Patrick A. Hasenjager
> Network Administrator
> Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences
>  
> phone 816.283.2478
> fax 816.283.0692
> email phasenjager at kcumb.edu
---------------
My best guess with little info is something is
peculiar with the manner in which you put the machine
together. One pitfall is installing SLES 10, patching it,
and later adding OES2. If you did that then I suggest
starting over and avoid patching until both halves are
installed. Otherwise we would need to know more about
how the server was constructed.
Joe D.
_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell

From PHasenjager at kcumb.edu  Tue Jun 23 14:43:14 2009
From: PHasenjager at kcumb.edu (Patrick Hasenjager)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:43:14 -0500
Subject: OES2 Linux - NoRM
In-Reply-To: <4A40A63F.D335.0084.1@groupwise.cf.ac.uk>
References: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>
	<4A40A63F.D335.0084.1@groupwise.cf.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <4A4095A202000005001AC5F8@smtp.kcumb.edu>

The users are already LUM enabled.
 
Patrick A. Hasenjager
Network Administrator
Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences
 
phone 816.283.2478
fax 816.283.0692
email phasenjager at kcumb.edu


>>> On 6/23/2009 at 3:54 AM, "Paul Rock" <rockp at Cardiff.ac.uk> wrote:

> We are in the process of putting our first OES2 Linux server online.  We are 
> having a problem logging into NoRM.  We can login successfully as "root," but 
> not as any eDirectory user.
>  
> If we attempt to login as the username only (i.e. phasenjager), it states 
> invalid username or password.  If we attempt to login with the full context, 
> it kills the novell-httpstkd process.  I have scoured the forums and support 
> site, but could not find anything useful.  LUM is enabled on this server, and 
> if I run an "id phasenjager" command, I get the appropriate response with the 
> group memberships, etc.  I cannot come up with any other reason for this 
> problem.
>  
> Any suggestions of where to look?

I think the users need to be LUM-enabled. (grrrr - oh how I hate LUM...)

- Paul

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell

From joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk  Tue Jun 23 17:17:25 2009
From: joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk (jrd)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:17:25 +0100
Subject: OES2 Linux - NoRM
In-Reply-To: <4A40959102000005001AC5F3@smtp.kcumb.edu>
References: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>	<4A40910B.3040502@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
	<4A40959102000005001AC5F3@smtp.kcumb.edu>
Message-ID: <4A410015.4050003@oucs.ox.ac.uk>

Patrick Hasenjager wrote:
> The server was installed with an integrated SLES10 SP2/OES2 SP1 installation.  It was then patched to current levels.
>  
> Patrick A. Hasenjager
> Network Administrator
> Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences
>  
> phone 816.283.2478
> fax 816.283.0692
> email phasenjager at kcumb.edu
>   
-------------
       I hate to start answering by asking a question, but it seems 
useful here.
That integrated installation, might that mean invoking the add-on OES 
product
choice while installing SLES 10? Normally I avoid that by doing SLES 10,
polish it, and later add OES2, and that works fine. A vital polish step 
is having
ntp perform correctly. Naturally during eDir work we double check time sync
status, else trouble.
     A couple of other comments. We don't know what other apps you added,
but there is a chance that an important one was missed out and not revealed
by YaST. In addition, httpstkd needs a certificate and that is generated 
during
installation. Restarting ndsd invokes a fixer-upper health check item to 
redo
certs if they appear to be bad. NMAS is not involved with httpstkd 
activities,
not that I know of anyway. Finally, admin should be LUM enabled by the
installation steps, but other users need manual treatment.
    Joe D.

From joea at j4computers.com  Tue Jun 23 18:59:47 2009
From: joea at j4computers.com (joea at j4computers.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:59:47 -0400
Subject: Error 0x6f authenticating in ConsoleOne, Linux
Message-ID: <4A42AECA02000085000600AD@FS-LIN-OES>

Intermittent ability to authenticate when opening ConsoleOne, Linux, when specifying Tree Name. OK using IP address. 

TID 3027266 addresses the issue as an OpenSLP issue. Anyone have further information? 

For us, when it happens, it always happens, until we exit ConsoleOne and restart it. Then, it seems to work. Until next time.  Seems like a "toggle". 

joe a.


From PHasenjager at kcumb.edu  Tue Jun 23 19:08:23 2009
From: PHasenjager at kcumb.edu (Patrick Hasenjager)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:08:23 -0500
Subject: OES2 Linux - NoRM
In-Reply-To: <4A410015.4050003@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
References: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>
	<4A40910B.3040502@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
	<4A40959102000005001AC5F3@smtp.kcumb.edu>
	<4A410015.4050003@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <4A40D3C702000005001AC613@smtp.kcumb.edu>

I am in the process of reloading per your suggestion below.  The previous install was a SLES10 with add-on media for OES2, done at once.
 
This is a 64-bit platform that was a fresh install last week.  The OES components selected were iManager, NRM and eDirectory (with other components being automatically selected).  Time was in sync, but there was no replica on that server.
 
Patrick A. Hasenjager
Network Administrator
Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences
 
phone 816.283.2478
fax 816.283.0692
email phasenjager at kcumb.edu


>>> On 6/23/2009 at 11:17 AM, jrd <joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

Patrick Hasenjager wrote:
> The server was installed with an integrated SLES10 SP2/OES2 SP1 installation.  It was then patched to current levels.
>  
> Patrick A. Hasenjager
> Network Administrator
> Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences
>  
> phone 816.283.2478
> fax 816.283.0692
> email phasenjager at kcumb.edu
>   
-------------
       I hate to start answering by asking a question, but it seems 
useful here.
That integrated installation, might that mean invoking the add-on OES 
product
choice while installing SLES 10? Normally I avoid that by doing SLES 10,
polish it, and later add OES2, and that works fine. A vital polish step 
is having
ntp perform correctly. Naturally during eDir work we double check time sync
status, else trouble.
     A couple of other comments. We don't know what other apps you added,
but there is a chance that an important one was missed out and not revealed
by YaST. In addition, httpstkd needs a certificate and that is generated 
during
installation. Restarting ndsd invokes a fixer-upper health check item to 
redo
certs if they appear to be bad. NMAS is not involved with httpstkd 
activities,
not that I know of anyway. Finally, admin should be LUM enabled by the
installation steps, but other users need manual treatment.
    Joe D.
_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell

From joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk  Tue Jun 23 19:24:49 2009
From: joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk (jrd)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:24:49 +0100
Subject: OES2 Linux - NoRM
In-Reply-To: <4A40D3C702000005001AC613@smtp.kcumb.edu>
References: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>	<4A40910B.3040502@oucs.ox.ac.uk>	<4A40959102000005001AC5F3@smtp.kcumb.edu>	<4A410015.4050003@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
	<4A40D3C702000005001AC613@smtp.kcumb.edu>
Message-ID: <4A411DF1.2000804@oucs.ox.ac.uk>

Patrick Hasenjager wrote:
> I am in the process of reloading per your suggestion below.  The previous install was a SLES10 with add-on media for OES2, done at once.
>  
> This is a 64-bit platform that was a fresh install last week.  The OES components selected were iManager, NRM and eDirectory (with other components being automatically selected).  Time was in sync, but there was no replica on that server.
>  
> Patrick A. Hasenjager
> Network Administrator
> Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences
>  
> phone 816.283.2478
> fax 816.283.0692
> email phasenjager at kcumb.edu
>
>   
-----------
       While you are about it, a good idea is to select many more
OES2 apps and leave them turned off. That way they will be ready
after patches. I omit ARK (archive and versioning), clustering,
DSFW. but include just about all other OES2 apps. Yes, I include
iFolder and iPrint. This scheme does produce a working server,
and some apps are sitting quietly in reserve should they be needed.
     For the SLES 10 part, I add Apache as it will be needed by
OES2. Naturally one also adds kernel sources, C compiler,
32 bit compatibility mode libs, vsftpd, telnet etc, but I omit Xen.
     Joe D.

From alandpearson at yahoo.com  Tue Jun 23 19:43:38 2009
From: alandpearson at yahoo.com (Alan Pearson)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:43:38 +0100
Subject: Error 0x6f authenticating in ConsoleOne, Linux
In-Reply-To: <4A42AECA02000085000600AD@FS-LIN-OES>
References: <4A42AECA02000085000600AD@FS-LIN-OES>
Message-ID: <D22888D8-B3FD-4892-973D-AD34BD77BAB4@yahoo.com>

Check that /etc/slpd.conf has correct info in, especially Scope, & DA  
addresses
Dont' rely on multicast

Check that slp is running ! rcslpd status





---
AlanP


On 23 Jun 2009, at 18:59, joea at j4computers.com wrote:

> Intermittent ability to authenticate when opening ConsoleOne, Linux,  
> when specifying Tree Name. OK using IP address.
>
> TID 3027266 addresses the issue as an OpenSLP issue. Anyone have  
> further information?
>
> For us, when it happens, it always happens, until we exit ConsoleOne  
> and restart it. Then, it seems to work. Until next time.  Seems like  
> a "toggle".
>
> joe a.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Novell mailing list
> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell



From alandpearson at yahoo.com  Tue Jun 23 19:49:48 2009
From: alandpearson at yahoo.com (Alan Pearson)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:49:48 +0100
Subject: OES2 Linux - NoRM
In-Reply-To: <4A411DF1.2000804@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
References: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>	<4A40910B.3040502@oucs.ox.ac.uk>	<4A40959102000005001AC5F3@smtp.kcumb.edu>	<4A410015.4050003@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
	<4A40D3C702000005001AC613@smtp.kcumb.edu>
	<4A411DF1.2000804@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <D072E676-8A3F-461C-B94C-C5E1BF7AE92B@yahoo.com>



> --------
>      While you are about it, a good idea is to select many more
> OES2 apps and leave them turned off. That way they will be ready
> after patches. I omit ARK (archive and versioning), clustering,
> DSFW. but include just about all other OES2 apps. Yes, I include
> iFolder and iPrint. This scheme does produce a working server,
> and some apps are sitting quietly in reserve should they be needed.
>    For the SLES 10 part, I add Apache as it will be needed by
> OES2. Naturally one also adds kernel sources, C compiler,
> 32 bit compatibility mode libs, vsftpd, telnet etc, but I omit Xen.


I take the total opposite approach - only install what is needed.
If it's not there, it won't cause trouble.
The install SLES then OES is also opposite of what I do, the OES2SP1  
install is very well polished and yet to fail on me doing both at one  
(32 + 64 bits tried)

The 'always updated, ready to go' is also addressed by having the  
server registered against either Novell Customer Update Servers or a  
local SMT server.
That way the latest version of apps will be installed, very easily  
using Yast.
IMHO, there's nothing worse than a fat server will all sorts of  
nonsense that may go wrong.

Let OES2 install at the same time as SLES, and let it pick it's  
dependencies etc.
All the issues mentioned with NTP etc are addressed at install time.


Re your NORM issue, I have one thing to say (not helpful !) - NORM on  
linux sucks.

Some trouble shooting steps though, can you do

id admin

at a command prompt and get a valid answer ?

Are the users you try to login as all enabled using LUM for that  
server ?






From joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk  Tue Jun 23 20:05:26 2009
From: joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk (jrd)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:05:26 +0100
Subject: OES2 Linux - NoRM
In-Reply-To: <D072E676-8A3F-461C-B94C-C5E1BF7AE92B@yahoo.com>
References: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>	<4A40910B.3040502@oucs.ox.ac.uk>	<4A40959102000005001AC5F3@smtp.kcumb.edu>	<4A410015.4050003@oucs.ox.ac.uk>	<4A40D3C702000005001AC613@smtp.kcumb.edu>	<4A411DF1.2000804@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
	<D072E676-8A3F-461C-B94C-C5E1BF7AE92B@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <4A412776.1020001@oucs.ox.ac.uk>

Alan Pearson wrote:
>
>
>> --------
>>      While you are about it, a good idea is to select many more
>> OES2 apps and leave them turned off. That way they will be ready
>> after patches. I omit ARK (archive and versioning), clustering,
>> DSFW. but include just about all other OES2 apps. Yes, I include
>> iFolder and iPrint. This scheme does produce a working server,
>> and some apps are sitting quietly in reserve should they be needed.
>>    For the SLES 10 part, I add Apache as it will be needed by
>> OES2. Naturally one also adds kernel sources, C compiler,
>> 32 bit compatibility mode libs, vsftpd, telnet etc, but I omit Xen.
>
>
> I take the total opposite approach - only install what is needed.
> If it's not there, it won't cause trouble.
       If I might refine the line above: if it is not running it won't 
cause trouble.
The reason for my approach is dealing with the future, when installing 
an OES2 app
well after the fact (after sundry patches) can lead to trouble from 
accumulated patching.
I have an incident in progress on yet another of these problems.
> The install SLES then OES is also opposite of what I do, the OES2SP1 
> install is very well polished and yet to fail on me doing both at one 
> (32 + 64 bits tried)
       Just what failed might be of interest. The most sensitive spot is 
eDir into an
existing tree, and the usual problems are either time out of sync or our 
making a
typo.
> The 'always updated, ready to go' is also addressed by having the 
> server registered against either Novell Customer Update Servers or a 
> local SMT server.
> That way the latest version of apps will be installed, very easily 
> using Yast.
> IMHO, there's nothing worse than a fat server will all sorts of 
> nonsense that may go wrong.
>
       The extensive testing was done with material up to and including 
the FCS media.
The same is NOT true for patched material.
> Let OES2 install at the same time as SLES, and let it pick it's 
> dependencies etc.
> All the issues mentioned with NTP etc are addressed at install time.
>
       Actually, NTP configuration at install time is primitive. I 
recommend fixing that
before letting eDir be configured.
       Joe D.
>
> Re your NORM issue, I have one thing to say (not helpful !) - NORM on 
> linux sucks.
>
> Some trouble shooting steps though, can you do
>
> id admin
>
> at a command prompt and get a valid answer ?
>
> Are the users you try to login as all enabled using LUM for that server ?
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Novell mailing list
> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell


From joea at j4computers.com  Tue Jun 23 20:38:58 2009
From: joea at j4computers.com (joea at j4computers.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:38:58 -0400
Subject: Error 0x6f authenticating in ConsoleOne, Linux
Message-ID: <4A42C6F902000085000600BE@FS-LIN-OES>

Nothing has changed, in months, AFAIK.   Happens on multiple machines (servers).
 
slp.conf shows proper.  restarted slpd.  Same results.
 
joe a.

>>> Alan Pearson <alandpearson at yahoo.com> 06/24/09 11:50 PM >>> 
Check that /etc/slpd.conf has correct info in, especially Scope, & DA 
addresses 
Dont' rely on multicast 

Check that slp is running ! rcslpd status 





--- 
AlanP 


On 23 Jun 2009, at 18:59, joea at j4computers.com wrote: 

> Intermittent ability to authenticate when opening ConsoleOne, Linux, 
> when specifying Tree Name. OK using IP address. 
> 
> TID 3027266 addresses the issue as an OpenSLP issue. Anyone have 
> further information? 
> 
> For us, when it happens, it always happens, until we exit ConsoleOne 
> and restart it. Then, it seems to work. Until next time. Seems like 
> a "toggle". 
> 
> joe a. 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Novell mailing list 
> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 


_______________________________________________ 
Novell mailing list 
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell


From MollardM at mbc.qld.edu.au  Wed Jun 24 05:55:55 2009
From: MollardM at mbc.qld.edu.au (Michael Mollard)
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:55:55 +1000
Subject: ZEN App Virtualization and Adobe CS4?
Message-ID: <4A423E79.E927.0018.0@mbc.qld.edu.au>

Hi all,
Just wondering if anyone has done much with ZAV?  I'm trying to build a Virtual Sanboxed App for Adobe Creative Suite 4, but an getting 'catastrophic failure' every time I build.

Has anyone had any luck with this?  

Cheers.

Michael Mollard
Network Administrator
Moreton Bay College
mollardm at mbc.qld.edu.au
http://www.mbc.qld.edu.au
Ph: (Direct) 07 3907 5712 / (Mob) 0417 631 801 
Fax: 07 3390 8919 ( http://www.mbc.qld.edu.au )


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Whilst every attempt has been made to ensure that material contained in this email is free from computer viruses or other defects, the attached files are provided, and may only be used, on the basis that the user assumes all responsibility for use of the material transmitted. This email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity names above and may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please note that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by return email or telephone 07 3390 8555 and destroy the original message. The contents of this message are provided without responsibility in law for their accuracy or otherwise, and without assumption of a duty of care by the School.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From joe.acquisto at gmail.com  Wed Jun 24 14:18:48 2009
From: joe.acquisto at gmail.com (joe Acquisto)
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:18:48 -0400
Subject: Error 0x6f authenticating in ConsolOne, Linux
Message-ID: <5e7da10a0906240618v53248855ib91fe2573edaf5f4@mail.gmail.com>

Thought I'd add a discovery, just made (in addition to ISP changing my IP in
the middle of the night and DNS not being changed, so my normal webmail does
not work, hence having to subscribe via gmail, and . . . sigh).

It's not really a "toggle".  Sependipty  intervened, in that I double
clicked on the C1 shortcut on the Linux gui and opened two instance of C1.
Aha!  one works, the other does not.  Baha! I don't know what that means.

Maybe I will later.

joe a.

>>>

Nothing has changed, in months, AFAIK.   Happens on multiple machines
(servers).

slp.conf shows proper.  restarted slpd.  Same results.

joe a.

>>>* Alan Pearson <alandpearson at yahoo.com<http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell>>
06/24/09 11:50 PM >>>
*Check that /etc/slpd.conf has correct info in, especially Scope, & DA
addresses
Dont' rely on multicast

Check that slp is running ! rcslpd status

From alandpearson at yahoo.com  Wed Jun 24 17:03:08 2009
From: alandpearson at yahoo.com (Alan Pearson)
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:03:08 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Error 0x6f authenticating in ConsolOne, Linux
In-Reply-To: <5e7da10a0906240618v53248855ib91fe2573edaf5f4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5e7da10a0906240618v53248855ib91fe2573edaf5f4@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <57931.88.211.54.85.1245859388.squirrel@83.67.10.8>

Hmm.
How do you launch C1 ?

Can you tell me what is in the shortcut ?
I wonder has it been modified to launch C1 twice by some C1 update or
other adding another entry to it.
I normally launch from command line, just the way we work round here
(non-gui servers)




-- 
AlanP

On Wed, June 24, 2009 2:18 pm, joe Acquisto wrote:
> Thought I'd add a discovery, just made (in addition to ISP changing my IP
> in
> the middle of the night and DNS not being changed, so my normal webmail
> does
> not work, hence having to subscribe via gmail, and . . . sigh).
>
> It's not really a "toggle".  Sependipty  intervened, in that I double
> clicked on the C1 shortcut on the Linux gui and opened two instance of C1.
> Aha!  one works, the other does not.  Baha! I don't know what that means.
>
> Maybe I will later.
>
> joe a.
>
>>>>
>
> Nothing has changed, in months, AFAIK.   Happens on multiple machines
> (servers).
>
> slp.conf shows proper.  restarted slpd.  Same results.
>
> joe a.
>
>>>>* Alan Pearson <alandpearson at
>>>> yahoo.com<http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell>>
> 06/24/09 11:50 PM >>>
> *Check that /etc/slpd.conf has correct info in, especially Scope, & DA
> addresses
> Dont' rely on multicast
>
> Check that slp is running ! rcslpd status
> _______________________________________________
> Novell mailing list
> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell
>



From joe.acquisto at gmail.com  Wed Jun 24 20:24:18 2009
From: joe.acquisto at gmail.com (joe Acquisto)
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:24:18 -0400
Subject: Error 0x6f authenticating in ConsolOne, Linux
In-Reply-To: <57931.88.211.54.85.1245859388.squirrel@83.67.10.8>
References: <5e7da10a0906240618v53248855ib91fe2573edaf5f4@mail.gmail.com>
	<57931.88.211.54.85.1245859388.squirrel@83.67.10.8>
Message-ID: <5e7da10a0906241224q59280aecq89799eab59459bf1@mail.gmail.com>

We just have the standard OES1 gui, with the single click icon
activation.  Just this one has GUI installed as it is used as a GW "admin"
box,   Since I ping pong between Windows PC's and this particular box, I
sometimes forget and double click on the icon.
In this case, it led us to the solution.

joe a.

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Alan Pearson <alandpearson at yahoo.com>wrote:

> Hmm.
> How do you launch C1 ?
>
> Can you tell me what is in the shortcut ?
> I wonder has it been modified to launch C1 twice by some C1 update or
> other adding another entry to it.
> I normally launch from command line, just the way we work round here
> (non-gui servers)
>
>
>
>
> --
> AlanP
>
> On Wed, June 24, 2009 2:18 pm, joe Acquisto wrote:
> > Thought I'd add a discovery, just made (in addition to ISP changing my IP
> > in
> > the middle of the night and DNS not being changed, so my normal webmail
> > does
> > not work, hence having to subscribe via gmail, and . . . sigh).
> >
> > It's not really a "toggle".  Sependipty  intervened, in that I double
> > clicked on the C1 shortcut on the Linux gui and opened two instance of
> C1.
> > Aha!  one works, the other does not.  Baha! I don't know what that means.
> >
> > Maybe I will later.
> >
> > joe a.
> >
> >>>>
> >
> > Nothing has changed, in months, AFAIK.   Happens on multiple machines
> > (servers).
> >
> > slp.conf shows proper.  restarted slpd.  Same results.
> >
> > joe a.
> >
> >>>>* Alan Pearson <alandpearson at
> >>>> yahoo.com<http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell>>
> > 06/24/09 11:50 PM >>>
> > *Check that /etc/slpd.conf has correct info in, especially Scope, & DA
> > addresses
> > Dont' rely on multicast
> >
> > Check that slp is running ! rcslpd status
> > _______________________________________________
> > Novell mailing list
> > Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
> > http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Novell mailing list
> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell
>

From PHasenjager at kcumb.edu  Thu Jun 25 14:09:49 2009
From: PHasenjager at kcumb.edu (Patrick Hasenjager)
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:09:49 -0500
Subject: OES2 Linux - NoRM
In-Reply-To: <4A411DF1.2000804@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
References: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>
	<4A40910B.3040502@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
	<4A40959102000005001AC5F3@smtp.kcumb.edu>
	<4A410015.4050003@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
	<4A40D3C702000005001AC613@smtp.kcumb.edu>
	<4A411DF1.2000804@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <4A4330CD02000005001AC6D5@smtp.kcumb.edu>

I have reloaded the server with the same results (except I can see the NCP stuff in NoRM now).  I did not install all of the extras like you mentioned, because this server is only to be used as a GroupWise server and will never be anything else.
 
Patrick A. Hasenjager
Network Administrator
Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences
 
phone 816.283.2478
fax 816.283.0692
email phasenjager at kcumb.edu


>>> On 6/23/2009 at 1:24 PM, jrd <joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

Patrick Hasenjager wrote:
> I am in the process of reloading per your suggestion below.  The previous install was a SLES10 with add-on media for OES2, done at once.
>  
> This is a 64-bit platform that was a fresh install last week.  The OES components selected were iManager, NRM and eDirectory (with other components being automatically selected).  Time was in sync, but there was no replica on that server.
>  
> Patrick A. Hasenjager
> Network Administrator
> Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences
>  
> phone 816.283.2478
> fax 816.283.0692
> email phasenjager at kcumb.edu
>
>   
-----------
       While you are about it, a good idea is to select many more
OES2 apps and leave them turned off. That way they will be ready
after patches. I omit ARK (archive and versioning), clustering,
DSFW. but include just about all other OES2 apps. Yes, I include
iFolder and iPrint. This scheme does produce a working server,
and some apps are sitting quietly in reserve should they be needed.
     For the SLES 10 part, I add Apache as it will be needed by
OES2. Naturally one also adds kernel sources, C compiler,
32 bit compatibility mode libs, vsftpd, telnet etc, but I omit Xen.
     Joe D.
_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell

From joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk  Thu Jun 25 14:15:56 2009
From: joe.doupnik at oucs.ox.ac.uk (Joe Doupnik)
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:15:56 +0100
Subject: OES2 Linux - NoRM
In-Reply-To: <4A4330CD02000005001AC6D5@smtp.kcumb.edu>
References: <4A3FAC6402000005001AC5BB@smtp.kcumb.edu>	<4A40910B.3040502@oucs.ox.ac.uk>	<4A40959102000005001AC5F3@smtp.kcumb.edu>	<4A410015.4050003@oucs.ox.ac.uk>	<4A40D3C702000005001AC613@smtp.kcumb.edu>	<4A411DF1.2000804@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
	<4A4330CD02000005001AC6D5@smtp.kcumb.edu>
Message-ID: <4A43788C.1040607@oucs.ox.ac.uk>

Patrick Hasenjager wrote:
> I have reloaded the server with the same results (except I can see the NCP stuff in NoRM now).  I did not install all of the extras like you mentioned, because this server is only to be used as a GroupWise server and will never be anything else.
>  
> Patrick A. Hasenjager
> Network Administrator
> Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences
>
----------
	I am pleased that you are making progress. As you and everyone can surmise,
trying to diagnose via email requires some detailed information from the side having
difficulties, else we deal with too many generalities. Thus it would be useful in future
to have a more detailed description of what is going on, and for large things (screen
scrapes etc) putting them on a local web site might be the best way (not to the list,
please).
	Joe D.

From MollardM at mbc.qld.edu.au  Fri Jun 26 11:59:07 2009
From: MollardM at mbc.qld.edu.au (Michael Mollard)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:59:07 +1000
Subject: GW8 upgrade woes ..
In-Reply-To: <4A44C35A0200004E0005F8FA@com-gwia.hamk.fi>
References: <4A44C35A0200004E0005F8FA@com-gwia.hamk.fi>
Message-ID: <4A45369B.E927.0018.1@mbc.qld.edu.au>

Hi all,
Well, I finally did the GW7-> GW8 upgrade today.  We run GW on a 2 node
NW6.5sp8 cluster.
Everything seemed to go ok.  But somehow WebAccess is stuffed.

I have started apache, tomcat4,and gwinter, but when trying to access
the webaccess page in my browser, I get a Tomcat error
This means nothing to me.  Any idea how I can get more info on the
error,or how I can safely remove all the webaccess stuff, and re-install
it?

I've spent the last few hours trying to make sense of this, and have
hit the wall.  

Any thoughts appreciated.
Here is the error...

?----------
HTTP Status 500 -

type Exception report

message

description The server encountered an internal error () that prevented
it from fulfilling this request.

exception

javax.servlet.ServletException: Servlet.init() for servlet webacc threw
exception
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.loadServlet(StandardWrapper.java:908)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.allocate(StandardWrapper.java:613)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:164)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:596)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:433)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:955)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:139)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:596)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:433)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:955)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.invoke(StandardContext.java:2460)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:133)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:596)
	at
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorDispatcherValve.invoke(ErrorDispatcherValve.java:119)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:594)
	at
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:117)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:594)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:433)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:955)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:127)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:596)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:433)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:955)
	at
org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:157)
	at
org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler.invoke(JkCoyoteHandler.java:200)
	at
org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:283)
	at
org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:773)
	at
org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection(ChannelSocket.java:703)
	at
org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket$SocketConnection.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:895)
	at
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)

root cause

java.lang.NullPointerException
	at
com.novell.webaccess.common.BaseServlet.loadOptionalConfigs(Unknown
Source)
	at com.novell.webaccess.common.BaseServlet.loadConfig(Unknown
Source)
	at com.novell.webaccess.common.BaseServlet.initSettings(Unknown
Source)
	at com.novell.webaccess.WebAccessServlet.initSettings(Unknown
Source)
	at
com.novell.webaccess.common.BaseServlet.callInitSettings(Unknown
Source)
	at com.novell.webaccess.common.BaseServlet.init(Unknown Source)
	at com.novell.webaccess.WebAccessServlet.init(Unknown Source)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.loadServlet(StandardWrapper.java:880)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.allocate(StandardWrapper.java:613)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:164)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:596)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:433)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:955)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:139)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:596)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:433)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:955)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.invoke(StandardContext.java:2460)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:133)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:596)
	at
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorDispatcherValve.invoke(ErrorDispatcherValve.java:119)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:594)
	at
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:117)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:594)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:433)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:955)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:127)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:596)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:433)
	at
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:955)
	at
org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:157)
	at
org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler.invoke(JkCoyoteHandler.java:200)
	at
org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:283)
	at
org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:773)
	at
org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection(ChannelSocket.java:703)
	at
org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket$SocketConnection.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:895)
	at
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)

Apache Tomcat/4.1.36-LE-jdk14

?----------------------------------------

Thanks.


Michael Mollard
Network Administrator
Moreton Bay College
mollardm at mbc.qld.edu.au
http://www.mbc.qld.edu.au
Ph: (Direct) 07 3907 5712 / (Mob) 0417 631 801 
Fax: 07 3390 8919 ( http://www.mbc.qld.edu.au )


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Whilst every attempt has been made to ensure that material
contained in this email is free from computer viruses or other defects,
the attached files are provided, and may only be used, on the basis that
the user assumes all responsibility for use of the material transmitted.
This email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity
names above and may contain information that is confidential and
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please note that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us
immediately by return email or telephone 07 3390 8555 and destroy the
original message. The contents of this message are provided without
responsibility in law for their accuracy or otherwise, and without
assumption of a duty of care by the School.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From HPfeil at uca.edu  Fri Jun 26 20:05:58 2009
From: HPfeil at uca.edu (Hans Pfeil)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:05:58 -0500
Subject: iFolder3.7
Message-ID: <4A44D5C4.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>

Hey all, running OES2SP1-LX-64bit with ext3 as the file system on a test server.  My data store for iFolder is on the SAN connected via ISCSI also ext3.  Setup some test users.  In the iFolder Management System we limit each user to 2 iFolders.   Install the iFolder 3.7 client on a WinXP-SP3 workstation.  Here is the problem.   It lets me create as many as I want.   Tried with different users and different workstations.  I get the same results.  Is this a bug?  Anybody have the same setup?

Thanks
Hans



From budthegrey at gmail.com  Fri Jun 26 20:32:07 2009
From: budthegrey at gmail.com (Bud Durland)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:32:07 -0400
Subject: GW8 upgrade woes ..
In-Reply-To: <4A45369B.E927.0018.1@mbc.qld.edu.au>
References: <4A44C35A0200004E0005F8FA@com-gwia.hamk.fi>
	<4A45369B.E927.0018.1@mbc.qld.edu.au>
Message-ID: <509526700906261232h2a5bd48dx5c1e2674b9237b51@mail.gmail.com>

I seem to recall reading somewhere that GW8 uses a newer version
Tomcat (5 vs. 4?), an the load/startup order in the autoexec.ncf is
important.

Sorry I don't have more detail..


On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Michael Mollard<MollardM at mbc.qld.edu.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Well, I finally did the GW7-> GW8 upgrade today. ?We run GW on a 2 node
> NW6.5sp8 cluster.
> Everything seemed to go ok. ?But somehow WebAccess is stuffed.
>
> I have started apache, tomcat4,and gwinter, but when trying to access
> the webaccess page in my browser, I get a Tomcat error
> This means nothing to me. ?Any idea how I can get more info on the
> error,or how I can safely remove all the webaccess stuff, and re-install
> it?
>
> I've spent the last few hours trying to make sense of this, and have
> hit the wall.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------
I'm in my own little world.  But that's OK,
because they all know me here.

From MollardM at mbc.qld.edu.au  Sat Jun 27 01:54:08 2009
From: MollardM at mbc.qld.edu.au (Michael Mollard)
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 10:54:08 +1000
Subject: GW8 upgrade woes ..
In-Reply-To: <509526700906261232h2a5bd48dx5c1e2674b9237b51@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A44C35A0200004E0005F8FA@com-gwia.hamk.fi>
	<4A45369B.E927.0018.1@mbc.qld.edu.au>
	<509526700906261232h2a5bd48dx5c1e2674b9237b51@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A45FA50020000180000E643@gw.mbc.qld.edu.au>

Thanks Bud.
I re-read the docs, and apparently on NW it's Tomcat4, but on Linux Tomcat5.
I managed to fix it, had some apache and tomcat config files pointing to SYS: instead of GW: (cluster volume).  Long haul, but now seems to be working fine.
I haven't looked into the load order, but ir seems to be ok .. 

Cheers,
Michael.





Michael Mollard
Network Administrator
Moreton Bay College
mollardm at mbc.qld.edu.au
http://www.mbc.qld.edu.au
Ph: (Direct) 07 3907 5712 / (Mob) 0417 631 801 
Fax: 07 3390 8919
>>> Bud Durland <budthegrey at gmail.com> 27/06/2009 5:32 AM >>>
I seem to recall reading somewhere that GW8 uses a newer version
Tomcat (5 vs. 4?), an the load/startup order in the autoexec.ncf is
important.

Sorry I don't have more detail..


On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Michael Mollard<MollardM at mbc.qld.edu.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Well, I finally did the GW7-> GW8 upgrade today.  We run GW on a 2 node
> NW6.5sp8 cluster.
> Everything seemed to go ok.  But somehow WebAccess is stuffed.
>
> I have started apache, tomcat4,and gwinter, but when trying to access
> the webaccess page in my browser, I get a Tomcat error
> This means nothing to me.  Any idea how I can get more info on the
> error,or how I can safely remove all the webaccess stuff, and re-install
> it?
>
> I've spent the last few hours trying to make sense of this, and have
> hit the wall.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------
I'm in my own little world.  But that's OK,
because they all know me here.
_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Whilst every attempt has been made to ensure that material contained in this email is free from computer viruses or other defects, the attached files are provided, and may only be used, on the basis that the user assumes all responsibility for use of the material transmitted. This email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity names above and may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please note that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by return email or telephone 07 3390 8555 and destroy the original message. The contents of this message are provided without responsibility in law for their accuracy or otherwise, and without assumption of a duty of care by the School.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From petervl at gmail.com  Mon Jun 29 18:15:55 2009
From: petervl at gmail.com (Peter Van Lone)
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:15:55 -0500
Subject: change edir password from windows native client -- CIFS environment
Message-ID: <68b791330906291015p49ec6405nd6fb7681807e7995@mail.gmail.com>

How can a user on workstation that does NOT have the novell client,
change their password?

Current environment is nw65 sp6 -- universal password enabled, I believe.

P



------------------------------------------------------------
?It is from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human
history is shaped. Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to
improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends
forth a tiny ripple of hope.?

 Robert Francis Kennedy quotes ( U.S. attorney general and adviser, 1925-1968)


http://www.the-brights.net
http://xkcd.com/167

From MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us  Mon Jun 29 18:51:04 2009
From: MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us (Michael Glenn)
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:51:04 -0400
Subject: iFolder3.7
In-Reply-To: <4A44D5C4.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
References: <4A44D5C4.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
Message-ID: <4A48C6C7.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>

I have the iFolder volume running on a NSS partition zoned via RDM from the SAN. I haven't checked to see if the max folder limit is honored; perhaps I should.

Thanks for the heads-up.


>>> "Hans Pfeil" <HPfeil at uca.edu> 06/26/2009 15:05 >>>
Hey all, running OES2SP1-LX-64bit with ext3 as the file system on a test server.  My data store for iFolder is on the SAN connected via ISCSI also ext3.  Setup some test users.  In the iFolder Management System we limit each user to 2 iFolders.   Install the iFolder 3.7 client on a WinXP-SP3 workstation.  Here is the problem.   It lets me create as many as I want.   Tried with different users and different workstations.  I get the same results.  Is this a bug?  Anybody have the same setup?

Thanks
Hans


_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell


From MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us  Mon Jun 29 21:04:37 2009
From: MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us (Michael Glenn)
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:04:37 -0400
Subject: iFolder3.7
In-Reply-To: <4A48C6C7.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
References: <4A44D5C4.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
	<4A48C6C7.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
Message-ID: <4A48E614.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>

Ah, yup; my policy limit is currently 10, and one of my people was able to create 12.

Something's wrong.


>>> "Michael Glenn" <MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us> 06/29/2009 13:51 >>>
I have the iFolder volume running on a NSS partition zoned via RDM from the SAN. I haven't checked to see if the max folder limit is honored; perhaps I should.

Thanks for the heads-up.


>>> "Hans Pfeil" <HPfeil at uca.edu> 06/26/2009 15:05 >>>
Hey all, running OES2SP1-LX-64bit with ext3 as the file system on a test server.  My data store for iFolder is on the SAN connected via ISCSI also ext3.  Setup some test users.  In the iFolder Management System we limit each user to 2 iFolders.   Install the iFolder 3.7 client on a WinXP-SP3 workstation.  Here is the problem.   It lets me create as many as I want.   Tried with different users and different workstations.  I get the same results.  Is this a bug?  Anybody have the same setup?

Thanks
Hans


_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell


From HPfeil at uca.edu  Tue Jun 30 14:08:08 2009
From: HPfeil at uca.edu (Hans Pfeil)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:08:08 -0500
Subject: iFolder3.7
In-Reply-To: <4A48E614.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
References: <4A44D5C4.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
	<4A48C6C7.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
	<4A48E614.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
Message-ID: <4A49C7E5.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>

Thanks for the confirmation.  It was driving me nuts.

-Hans


>>> "Michael Glenn" <MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us> 6/29/2009 3:04 PM >>>
Ah, yup; my policy limit is currently 10, and one of my people was able to create 12.

Something's wrong.


>>> "Michael Glenn" <MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us> 06/29/2009 13:51 >>>
I have the iFolder volume running on a NSS partition zoned via RDM from the SAN. I haven't checked to see if the max folder limit is honored; perhaps I should.

Thanks for the heads-up.


>>> "Hans Pfeil" <HPfeil at uca.edu> 06/26/2009 15:05 >>>
Hey all, running OES2SP1-LX-64bit with ext3 as the file system on a test server.  My data store for iFolder is on the SAN connected via ISCSI also ext3.  Setup some test users.  In the iFolder Management System we limit each user to 2 iFolders.   Install the iFolder 3.7 client on a WinXP-SP3 workstation.  Here is the problem.   It lets me create as many as I want.   Tried with different users and different workstations.  I get the same results.  Is this a bug?  Anybody have the same setup?

Thanks
Hans


_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell


From MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us  Tue Jun 30 14:57:42 2009
From: MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us (Michael Glenn)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:57:42 -0400
Subject: iFolder3.7
In-Reply-To: <4A49C7E5.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
References: <4A44D5C4.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
	<4A48C6C7.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
	<4A48E614.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us> <4A49C7E5.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
Message-ID: <4A49E196.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>

I'll file a bug report on this. 


>>> "Hans Pfeil" <HPfeil at uca.edu> 06/30/2009 09:08 >>>
Thanks for the confirmation.  It was driving me nuts.

-Hans


>>> "Michael Glenn" <MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us> 6/29/2009 3:04 PM >>>
Ah, yup; my policy limit is currently 10, and one of my people was able to create 12.

Something's wrong.


>>> "Michael Glenn" <MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us> 06/29/2009 13:51 >>>
I have the iFolder volume running on a NSS partition zoned via RDM from the SAN. I haven't checked to see if the max folder limit is honored; perhaps I should.

Thanks for the heads-up.


>>> "Hans Pfeil" <HPfeil at uca.edu> 06/26/2009 15:05 >>>
Hey all, running OES2SP1-LX-64bit with ext3 as the file system on a test server.  My data store for iFolder is on the SAN connected via ISCSI also ext3.  Setup some test users.  In the iFolder Management System we limit each user to 2 iFolders.   Install the iFolder 3.7 client on a WinXP-SP3 workstation.  Here is the problem.   It lets me create as many as I want.   Tried with different users and different workstations.  I get the same results.  Is this a bug?  Anybody have the same setup?

Thanks
Hans


_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell


From HPfeil at uca.edu  Tue Jun 30 15:43:19 2009
From: HPfeil at uca.edu (Hans Pfeil)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:43:19 -0500
Subject: iFolder3.7
In-Reply-To: <4A49E196.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
References: <4A44D5C4.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
	<4A48C6C7.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
	<4A48E614.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us> <4A49C7E5.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
	<4A49E196.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
Message-ID: <4A49DE34.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>

Hey Michael just curious, can anybody file a bug report or just certain people?  How does one go about filing a bug report?

-Hans


>>> "Michael Glenn" <MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us> 6/30/2009 8:57 AM >>>
I'll file a bug report on this. 


>>> "Hans Pfeil" <HPfeil at uca.edu> 06/30/2009 09:08 >>>
Thanks for the confirmation.  It was driving me nuts.

-Hans


>>> "Michael Glenn" <MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us> 6/29/2009 3:04 PM >>>
Ah, yup; my policy limit is currently 10, and one of my people was able to create 12.

Something's wrong.


>>> "Michael Glenn" <MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us> 06/29/2009 13:51 >>>
I have the iFolder volume running on a NSS partition zoned via RDM from the SAN. I haven't checked to see if the max folder limit is honored; perhaps I should.

Thanks for the heads-up.


>>> "Hans Pfeil" <HPfeil at uca.edu> 06/26/2009 15:05 >>>
Hey all, running OES2SP1-LX-64bit with ext3 as the file system on a test server.  My data store for iFolder is on the SAN connected via ISCSI also ext3.  Setup some test users.  In the iFolder Management System we limit each user to 2 iFolders.   Install the iFolder 3.7 client on a WinXP-SP3 workstation.  Here is the problem.   It lets me create as many as I want.   Tried with different users and different workstations.  I get the same results.  Is this a bug?  Anybody have the same setup?

Thanks
Hans


_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell


From MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us  Tue Jun 30 18:10:52 2009
From: MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us (Michael Glenn)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:10:52 -0400
Subject: iFolder3.7
In-Reply-To: <4A49DE34.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
References: <4A44D5C4.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
	<4A48C6C7.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>
	<4A48E614.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us> <4A49C7E5.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
	<4A49E196.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us> <4A49DE34.6010.00BD.0@uca.edu>
Message-ID: <4A4A0EDC.33FD.002C.1@cco.state.oh.us>

Go here: http://support.novell.com/additional/bugreport.html 


>>> "Hans Pfeil" <HPfeil at uca.edu> 06/30/2009 10:43 >>>
Hey Michael just curious, can anybody file a bug report or just certain people?  How does one go about filing a bug report?

-Hans


>>> "Michael Glenn" <MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us> 6/30/2009 8:57 AM >>>
I'll file a bug report on this. 


>>> "Hans Pfeil" <HPfeil at uca.edu> 06/30/2009 09:08 >>>
Thanks for the confirmation.  It was driving me nuts.

-Hans


>>> "Michael Glenn" <MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us> 6/29/2009 3:04 PM >>>
Ah, yup; my policy limit is currently 10, and one of my people was able to create 12.

Something's wrong.


>>> "Michael Glenn" <MGlenn at cco.state.oh.us> 06/29/2009 13:51 >>>
I have the iFolder volume running on a NSS partition zoned via RDM from the SAN. I haven't checked to see if the max folder limit is honored; perhaps I should.

Thanks for the heads-up.


>>> "Hans Pfeil" <HPfeil at uca.edu> 06/26/2009 15:05 >>>
Hey all, running OES2SP1-LX-64bit with ext3 as the file system on a test server.  My data store for iFolder is on the SAN connected via ISCSI also ext3.  Setup some test users.  In the iFolder Management System we limit each user to 2 iFolders.   Install the iFolder 3.7 client on a WinXP-SP3 workstation.  Here is the problem.   It lets me create as many as I want.   Tried with different users and different workstations.  I get the same results.  Is this a bug?  Anybody have the same setup?

Thanks
Hans


_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell 

_______________________________________________
Novell mailing list
Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk 
http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell


From fubarsnafu69 at gmail.com  Tue Jun 30 20:06:10 2009
From: fubarsnafu69 at gmail.com (fred james)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:06:10 -0400
Subject: change edir password from windows native client -- CIFS 
	environment
In-Reply-To: <68b791330906291015p49ec6405nd6fb7681807e7995@mail.gmail.com>
References: <68b791330906291015p49ec6405nd6fb7681807e7995@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <32a559c50906301206g1f05175fwdc56a78a411d2bb0@mail.gmail.com>

Just a thought - Have you tried any of the password programs on Cool tools site.



On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Peter Van Lone<petervl at gmail.com> wrote:
> How can a user on workstation that does NOT have the novell client,
> change their password?
>
> Current environment is nw65 sp6 -- universal password enabled, I believe.
>
> P
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ?It is from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human
> history is shaped. Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to
> improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends
> forth a tiny ripple of hope.?
>
>  Robert Francis Kennedy quotes ( U.S. attorney general and adviser, 1925-1968)
>
>
> http://www.the-brights.net
> http://xkcd.com/167
> _______________________________________________
> Novell mailing list
> Novell at netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk
> http://netlab1.usu.edu/mailman/listinfo/novell
>